There's something in the article about auto-delete policies.
If those policies violated a recordkeeping requirement maybe a jury could infer it was done intentionally in furtherance of a crime
Or maybe even if it was set to auto delete messages after some really unusually short period. By that I mean if you configured it to delete messages after a few days it might be hard to explain the legitimate business purpose served by such a rule.
Homer enters a steak eating contest (but loses), the joke here is that the guy there (Big Red or something?) won but he's actually dead. Homer, feeling responsible, takes over his job driving his Big Rig across the country and discovers an industry secret
Ok u win. I didn't want to admit it, but I guess because it wasnt a festival for peace it's no big deal
Any theories on why ppl are getting all upset about this?
Maybe they havent heard you explain that it wasnt quite a festival for peace they attacked but a slightly different kind of festival?
The real scam is that that video is 15 min long.
Indicted in 2016 on witness coercion and the case is still "pending"...? Can I be forgiven for thinking there was no intent on ever bringing that to trial?
What's the recipe bro?
I mean, he got shot and he's recovered so.. in this case the consequences were definitely reversible.
I'm pretty sure it just drop ships you Chinese garbage from alibaba.
Gotcha -- that makes sense
How does it makes sense for the 7 pro and 8 pro to be priced identically? Why would you get a 7 pro if that's true?
Am I missing something?
Agreed. I actually can't even remember if I finished it or just set it down one day and forgot to come back to it.
The story was... Sort of interesting? The art direction was just way ahead of the gameplay, which was a shame.