flamingo_pinyata

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Where's the horse?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

It's full of originally stupidly pro-communist, now joined by the stupidly anti-communist people. Most of their discussions are "communism good you dumb" and "communism bad you dumb", with a bunch of kindergarten level gotchas.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I'll give you a different perspective. I don't vote in the US elections (given the impact on people in other countries maybe we should) so I won't focus on the Democrat/Republican thing but on the reasons for selecting a specific candidate.

Step 1 - deal breakers. Determine if the proposed policies cause any immediate regression in what is already achieved. Rolling back existing trans rights, banning abortion, stuff like that.

Step 2 - vibes. This is the critical one. Don't immediately look at positive policies you want implemented. Look at how a candidate winning would move the Overton Window .

After this election there will be more, and who wins today moves the general vibe of the entire political system. It sets a base for policies of future candidates who might not even know it yet.

Step 3 - narrowing down. Now if you have several candidates that pass step 2 equally, you can look at the specific policies. Generally you can expect any politician to overpromise (khm lie), but usually they try to achieve at least some of the stated goals.

In two-party electoral systems basically you can't often reach the step 3, but you do have primaries so it can be applied there.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I got convinced to "be realistic" and accept a shitty life because achieving greatness is impossible. I regret it every day, being in an environment I don't belong to, faking it because I need to survive somehow. The worst thing is once you stop "surfing the wave" (of your own thing whatever it is) it's almost impossible to recover and get back on the track.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why is this oniony? Except as an ingredient in the bowl

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I'd say this is exactly where the LLMs problems with it comes from. For most of us outside of the US and even a lot of people there, it's exactly that - a caricature of a lower class black person. However for many people it's a legit dialect of English they speak every day.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (19 children)

If someone needs another existental crisis here's a prompt:

  • Is math universal or is it a system of thought invented by humans and it only makes sense to us?
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You know what's most ironic, those executives decisions actually endangered their own lives. Who's a group of people typically flying quite frequently? Upper management. And it's more likely than not to be on a Boeing.

Imagine being so focused on shareholder value that you risk your life for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I'm late to the trend, but I'm jumping on the brat summer bandwagon

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's the biggest dildo I've ever seen

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I can imagine in a small startup with good interpersonal relationships it hurts less. I was never laid off but I worked in a small company like that and there were risky periods. It might have been an exception among most companies but we all had access to the revenue and expense data. There can be no surprises if everyone knows the financials.

 
 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›