Hogwarts Legacy would be great!
fedev
Check the documentation to see which driver supports your hardware before trying.
Once you have the correct driver, test to see if it is working properly, there are a few commands to do this.
Likely a little short for a stormtrooper too.
We surely did! Said no gnome developer ever.
It crashes beautifully. Might be an extension but I'm not eager for disappointment, I reverted the upgrade back.
Here is what I'm blocking with some comments on what you lose if you block certain domains. A few domains, I commented out because they would otherwise block some feature I actually wanted to use. If you block all, the TV would work but think it is offline:
Block LG Ads and telemetry #address=/lgtvsdp.com/ address=/lgsmartad.com/
needed for App Store
country based
{country_code}.lgrecommends.lgappstv.com
Blocking all
#address=/lgappstv.com/
address=/edgesuite.net/ #address=/ngfts.lge.com/ address=/yumenetworks.com/ address=/smartclip.com/ address=/smartclip.net/ address=/lgtvcommon.com/ address=/meethue.com/ address=/lgtviot.com/ #address=/lgtvonline.com/
Firmware updates
#address=/snu.lge.com/
address=/kic-ngfts.lge.com/ #address=/kic-gfts.lge.com/ #address=/lgtvonline.lge.com/ address=/sports.gracenote.com/ address=/cjpowercast.com.edgesuite.net/ address=/ueiwsp.com/ #address=/lgsmartplatform.com/ address=/NevoAI-IOTHub-52-Prod.azure-devices.net/ address=/m.media-amazon.com/ #address=/lss.lgthinq.com/ #address=/kic-op-lss.lgthinq.com/
Side effect, blocks LG chat support
#address=/lgeapi.com/
I DNS blocked my LG TV services because I got tired of being served with paid content which I do not want to see but they give no choice to opt-out of. For example the recommended movies and TV shows from Amazon Prime. I don't have Amazon and I don't intend to get it. There should be an option to remove that but you can't. Same with the sports section.
So now the TV works as it should. It can't find the source for that content and just hides it.
Get Pi-hole
This feature is available in Connect for Lemmy.
Maybe they have to do the Twitter way and show case their work behind a registration page or even better if there could be an implementation of the robots.txt file but for ai crawlers.
Still, there are countless of ways in which a reproduction could be leaked. I could buy a painting, which I then own, take a picture of it and upload it to a public location. Same for a book.
But I tend to agree that is the model generates an image or text that only has traces of the original work, then no compensation should be needed.
No. I am historicizing both LGBT people and Islam. I am saying that queerphobia and Islamaphobia are not the same. They have interactions of course, like all social phenomena does, but they are qualitatively different and have different responses.
Correct, definitively not the same, islamophobia won't legally put you in jail for up to 20 years.
You are set on target, you can see the point when talking about the Quran, that then it's ok to speak up, even if the country in which it happened, allows for the burning to happen. But then, when it comes to LGBT, the country's law must be respected and you can't talk about it.
Your stance is different than mine. I see that in both scenarios, there is work to be done to improve the current situation for both and that expressing your concerns should be acceptable. But what you are stating would seem to indicate that this is only acceptable when the Quran is affected but not the LGBT community. If Quran, speak up, is LGBT, shut up and don't interfere.
Very nice of you, thanks!