WhipTheLlama

joined 1 year ago
[–] WhipTheLlama 4 points 1 year ago

Staying inside is no defence against bears.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT5LI21dY_4

[–] WhipTheLlama 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not about the needle, it's about how Reddit acts during its death throes.

Reddit can't make money unless they monetize every user in every way possible, including selling their personal data if they have it. The API garbage was an attempt to monetize users in ways even their own app doesn't, and also an admission that advertising isn't paying the bills, or they would have just started advertising through the API.

So now we're seeing how Reddit behaves once they realize that charging for API access doesn't work. They will sell everyone and everything until they shut down.

[–] WhipTheLlama -5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

IIRC, he fought the Russians to protect Ukraine from their invasion. He had no other allegiance to Germany or Nazis. It was a "the enemy of my enemy is my ally" situation.

[–] WhipTheLlama 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The job I'm currently interviewing candidates for has 1800 applicants. I don't want a thread where that many people are talking, answering questions, and trying to get my attention for the job. I want a quick way to work through all the resumes so I can hire the best person.

[–] WhipTheLlama 0 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of speculation and zero evidence. Regardless, selfishness and cooperation aren't mutually exclusive.

[–] WhipTheLlama 6 points 1 year ago

If you want to earn enough money to live on, learn a skill and get a better job!

*Learns a skill and gets a better job*

Hey, not like that!

[–] WhipTheLlama 72 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'm currently working with a client that doesn't have a health endpoint or any kind of monitoring on their new API . They say monitoring isn't needed because it will never go down.

Naturally it went down on day two. They still haven't added any "unnecessary" monitoring, insisting that it will never go down.

[–] WhipTheLlama 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is nothing communist about that. He's not advocating abolishing private ownership. Businesses and workers both operate in the free market, which allows workers to advocate for their position in the market.

The free market doesn't exist in a communist economy. Communism uses a planned economy, so the government strongly regulates both businesses and workers. This eliminates workers' leverage over employers.

[–] WhipTheLlama 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If the only way to defend communism is by claiming that no country has ever done communism correctly, then that's a problem. You can't point to a single successful communist country because there aren't any.

China became far more successful since it abandoned communism for its own flavor of capitalism. Private ownership in China has led to a massive improvement in quality of life for most Chinese residents, and more opportunities for success than ever before.

Meanwhile, most complaints about capitalism have almost nothing to do with capitalism and everything to do with laws and regulations or human greed (which is the worst part of any system).

[–] WhipTheLlama 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I first installed OG Red Hat 5.2 in 1998, but my computer had a Winmodem rather than a full hardware modem, so I never got it connected to the internet, which severely reduced how useful it was to me. I got broadband a year later, and that changed everything!

[–] WhipTheLlama 16 points 1 year ago

they can lose the trademark if they don’t try to defend it

This is true, but that's if another company is using a similar logo as their own. Like, if a pet store used the Mickey Mouse logo, of course they're going to be sued.

If a daycare uses Mickey Mouse to decorate their classroom, Disney doesn't have to sue because the trademark isn't be used separate from Disney. The Daycare, and kids, are using it because it's Disney, so there is no confusion about trademark ownership.

At the very least, Disney could simply write them a letter allowing them to use depictions of Disney characters inside the school so long as it's not for advertising or commercial purposes and the art is done by a student or teacher.

view more: ‹ prev next ›