I really thought they were going to add a new tree shape instead of keeping the dark oak.
Snazz
joined 2 years ago
Different perspective here:
I don’t really get why people want to leave lopsided casual matches in the first place. You either get to chill out against easier opponents or get better by playing against stronger opponents. At the end of the day, winning or losing doesn't matter because, well it’s casual. If you wanted a balanced match every game where everyone is trying their best to win, then you should be playing ranked.
What annoyed me with the old system was when my team would go down 1 point, the teammate insta-leaves and then I get a bot or some unfortunate guy who joins into this match midway through.
The people leaving seemed to care more about winning than the match being lopsided; It was really rare to see someone from the winning team leave. And I know thats a common perspective to have, but for me personally, I like playing matches for more than 1 point. I think comeback games shouldn’t only happen in ranked.
With the changes, the casual playlist has improved in some ways and worsened in others. It is way more likely to get a team that sticks around for the full match, but the mode is more competitive now, which is not what it’s supposed to be like.
I think there was probably a better solution to the problem. The issue seems to occur when one player wants to leave, but the other wants to continue. An idea I had to reduce the chance of this happening was matching together the players who tend to abandon and matching together the players who tend to play out matches.
There are only 4.29 billion possible values of an int32, so even if you used 2 lines for each case, it’d still be under 10 billion lines of code
bool isOdd(int num) {
if (num == 1)
{ return true; }
if (num == 2)
{ return false; }
if (num == 3)
{ return true; }
…
}
How you express something absolutely does change the amount of information in the message. That’s the foundation of compression.
Bitmap image files tend to be larger than png files, even when they both represent the same image.
1.41421… can be thought of as an expanded form of sqrt(2). In this case, the expansion is to an infinite number of digits.
Because there are no units, the equation can only be used to compare one rate of work to another rate of work at a different time (or a different deadline).
ratio of rate of work at time t1 compared to rate of work at time t2
= rate_of_work(t1, d) / rate_of_work(t2, d)
= (1 / (d - t1)) / (1 / (d - t2))
= (d - t2) / (d - t1)
This works because the only variables left are in the same units, even if that unit itself is unspecified.
The related article on crevasse rescue is also an interesting read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crevasse_rescue
Im think it was designed with a clock in mind. That’s why it starts with north at the 12:00 position and goes clockwise. I learned it as ‘Never Eat Soggy Waffles’ but I’m sure there are a bunch of these.
I’d take a term of Mitt Romney over Trump. At least he
- had respect for the office
- could articulate sentences in a clear manor
- had a plan, and could explain it
- wasn’t a convicted felon/rapist
- had decorum in discourse/debates
News story #3 is actually kind of crazy to me. The only possible explanation for someone filling that lawsuit is if they don't believe in their own tenets. The suit has no grounds and is meant to suppress criticism.
It pretty clearly is a direct contradiction with tenet 4 (respecting freedoms of others, especially the freedom to offend) I might expect hypocrisy like this from other religious groups, but for TST, the tenets are a fundamental part of their movement.
Can confirm. I only had a bit of trouble with the last frame but was able to translate perfectly from context.
When I consider if the sentence is true, it claims to be false which is exclusive with truth, therefore the sentence is not true.
When I consider if the sentence is false, the claim is inverted, so the sentence has to be not false.
I arrived at a conclusion that is the opposite of Dialetheism, with the sentence being neither true nor false.
view more: next ›
I agree with you, but I don’t agree with the way you are presenting the point, and it could be a miscommunication, so I’ll explain:
Historically, ‘All Lives Matter’ was used to diminish the BLM movement. It is used as a response when it should be the premise. All Lives Matter, therefore Black Lives Matter, not the other way around.
I think the comment replying to you was using the All Lives Matter metaphor to say that your comment about it being a human being that was killed is deliberately ignoring the struggles for trans people. But the way they phrased it was very subtle.