LwL

joined 1 year ago
[–] LwL 7 points 8 months ago

Can't wait for that one to go horribly wrong.

[–] LwL 1 points 8 months ago

While what you said isn't wrong, it's not really the main issue. The energy a human body gets from food can be vastly different than what is produced by burning it, and there are further variations per person.

The calorie count on food to my knowledge is based on actual measurements with humans... from one guy doing experiments in the 1800s. And while it's probably reasonably accurate on average, it's not really possible to know how much energy a specific person will get from a food from a generalized calorie label. So even if the food itself had no variance, it would be impossible to label the energy intake you will get from it accurately.

[–] LwL 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Youtube has forced it onto their creators for a while. Censor swears or risk upsetting the almighty algorithm and getting demonetized, because apparently american companies don't like being associated with swearing.

[–] LwL 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would agree with this if not for the fact that you live in an absolute farce of a democracy where voting for a third party is nothing but a protest vote. Which seems fine to do in a state that will vote majority democrat anyway, but plain irresponsible in one that won't.

[–] LwL 6 points 9 months ago

If it's a public server (which the op would imply) then it's a problem because any idiot could join. Of course for some small server with friends it's fine. Though I have it off on mine anyway because people assume they don't have perms and will just write @everyone anyway

[–] LwL 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Allowing everyone to ping @everyone is asking for it though.

[–] LwL 23 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Actually determining the total gain seems insanely hard to impossible. Percentage of turnover is just easier to implement, and still effective if it can scale up as it can for gdpr.

[–] LwL 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Am I misunderstanding something or is that article saying "it's not CI/CO, it's actually CI/CO"? The incorrect assumption people make is that somehow the only change to energy intake and expenditure is food and exercise (which we have known for very long to not be the case and it's insane to me that people believe that), not that the law of conservation of energy somehow doesn't apply. If you expend more energy than you take in, you will lose weight. But measuring either of these things properly is close to impossible and certainly not as simple as "put your height and weight and what you eat and how much you exercise into a calculator".

[–] LwL 2 points 9 months ago

Yea that "joke" that doesnt even have a punchline is just acting like jews act the way israel does. Which is rare if it happens at all.

[–] LwL 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Oh no, a typo from hitting a key right next to the intended key, this has never happened in the history of journalism!

[–] LwL 12 points 9 months ago (5 children)

My first thought is the crew would be cooked alive

[–] LwL 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I played it on a pc that was ok at the time and the physics engine glitched out so things that were supposed to be sitting still on top of/next to each other would randomly collide and sometimes fly off. Still had fun with the game though.

view more: ‹ prev next ›