Leeker

joined 8 months ago
[–] Leeker 6 points 8 months ago

Not if the business is making under a certain amount each year. Then they can request for an exemption of the nutritional labeling.

[–] Leeker 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But they call it honey blend

That is illegal as the must label it with what the Honey is blended with. So in this case you'd need to have it labeled "Blended Honey with Corn Syrup" or some variation of that.

[–] Leeker 8 points 8 months ago (7 children)

You have to label the honey with the ingredients it is blended with as well in the US. So for this it would need to be "Blend of Honey and High Fructose Corn Syrup".

[–] Leeker 32 points 8 months ago (4 children)

It is also required in America. The FDA requires it except for small business. Also the EU wouldn't even let this have the word "Honey" in the name at all. I'd assume that the retail business above doesn't reach the threshold of 500,000 so can request for an exemption of nutritional labeling.

[–] Leeker 3 points 8 months ago

I’ll just grow em myself at that point.

So that's why they keep putting estrogen in all the food. Thanks for letting me know.

[–] Leeker 1 points 8 months ago

I mean you are given one of those when you are born or when you officially swear in as an American. But it is always nice when our officers do some community out reach like this.

[–] Leeker 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Didn't Searx lose support and maintenance?

[–] Leeker 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Is the bag held really well by the milk holder? I'd always worry about the bag tipping out of the milk holder, while pouring.

[–] Leeker 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Then how do they make chocolate milk?

[–] Leeker 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Since when have plants been alive? This is news to me. Next thing you are going to tell me is that plants also crave Brawndo.

[–] Leeker 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alright this sent me down a rabbit hole so I'm going to try to and summarize really quickly.

1^st^, VESA requires a membership but in reality you need a company that has a vested interest in what VESA does. So you have to pay a huge due to be apart of it. This is quite BS according to me, the fact that they can do this and still claim to be an open standard. Source

2^nd^, VESA never tried to implement a royalty based off the Display Port Standard. The company that did that was MPEG LA, LLC, they aren't affiliated with VESA. Rather this company is a patent pool company that attempted to enforce their clients (such as Sony) licensing fees. They seemed to have backed off of this back in 2016 as the last patent used was for the Display Port Standard 1.4. Source

3^rd^ Content Protection was necessary if you want wide spread adoption. Companies aren't going to want to do business with you if you allow for their IP to be ripped. As well, VESA is just a collection of companies that have voting shares in the company. So those corporate features are just par for the course.

view more: ‹ prev next ›