Audiobookbay and smart audiobook player is my setup too. I probably got it from a similar thread. My only annoyance is using audiobookbay's search can be annoying sometimes, but altogether I love both.
KombatWombat
joined 2 years ago
I haven't been in the workforce all that long but I did experience burnout at my previous job. I sacrificed my mental health so much that I couldn't concentrate well, meaning I spent longer on work which made me more on edge and things just kept spiraling like that. I had a couple of months to reset with unemployment that did wonders for me.
I found for me the problem wasn't the work itself but the amount and requirements for it. I am now at a different company doing much of the same tasks but with a less demanding schedule and can work from home. If I can't focus, I can just walk away and come back to a task instead of feeling like I'm going to explode being trapped in front of work I just cannot pay attention to. And when I am working, I usually have Youtube, an audiobook, music, or a podcast playing to capture overflowing attention. There are still times when it gets bad but it's uncommon and much more manageable.
I would focus on finding a company that has an emphasis on work-life balance, and is able to retain employees. Flexible schedules and work from home can be dangerous for people with ADHD but I honestly feel like it's almost necessary. I am not sure I could go back even if it doubled my salary.
Maybe this is just bait, but this is already how it works. I'll go over US law, but other countries likely have similar processes.
Legislation needs to have justification for restricting people, or it gets overturned when challenged. This is because it would fail the strict scrutiny test, making it unconstitutional. It needs to be "narrowly tailored" to a "legitimate government interest" to pass. In other words, it needs to be focussed on addressing a problem the government acknowledges some responsibility to solve, and do so in a way that doesn't cause undue restrictions beyond that goal.
Creating a law isn't an easy process, so they are made with purpose. That doesn't mean every law is a good law, but that's why we have these processes for reform after all. Sometimes you have old nonesense laws remain, but that is typically because they are unenforced or too detached from modern life for anyone to care to remove them.
You might look into Vagrus - The Riven Realms. It's a game where you manage a trade caravan and deal with resource management and random events. Also, Elite Dangerous or something like Euro Truck Simulator could be good.
This may be related to the male variability hypothesis. Males tend to show more variance from the mean for traits with a normal distribution. So for attractiveness, you are more likely to find both particularly attractive and particularly unattractive men than women, since the latter are going to mostly fall closer to the baseline level.
But personally, I agree the difference between putting in effort or not can have a bigger difference for men.
For these types of threads, I usually upvote things that are actually hot takes with some justification or unique insight. People that post an extremely popular decision or just insult something that a lot of people see value in get downvoted. Mostly it's moderately common takes or unusual opinions with no elaboration, so I don't vote on those.
There is also a consensus by biblical scholars that a man named Mark wrote the first gospel and that the resurrection was a true event. Do you also agree with the consensus here or is it only when it serves your opinion?<
This is not a matter of opinion, but historical fact. You were suggesting that Jesus was likely completely invented and I had heard this myth before. So I found a wikipedia link that discusses how the man wasn't entirely invented, and certain credible details of his life have been documented by other sources both secular and nonsecular. If you doubt it, there are references in the page that you can judge for yourself to believe or not. As for the other figures, I cannot say how much of their lives are invented and how much might have been true; I haven't looked. Consensus is not absolute fact of course, it is merely our shared best guess based on our information at the time. So it can be proven wrong with time, but that does not make it is less convincing than an individual's intuition.
There is zero primary evidence that the man existed and there should be piles of it. Even the minimum historical Jesus requires an insane sequence of events and is such an extraordinary claim that only extraordinary evidence would be justify believing in it.<
What do you feel is missing from what we have found? You may be overestimating how much primary evidence would be preserved and discovered by now. I would remind you that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Otherwise, I would be inclined to point out that we don't have any record of people doubting what would have been a major conspiracy from around that time.
Minimum historical Jesus would describe what exactly? A man was born in Palestine 2000 years ago, was believed by some to perform miracles, gained a following, threatened/angered others and as a result was crucified unjustly. I would hardly call this "insane". The corroborating details from earlier apocryphal gospels, various eyewitness testimonies recorded by Paul's letters, and Roman documents are plenty to make it more believable that various people honestly attempted to discuss real events rather than falsify history for an unclear motive.
So unless you got something better than the logical fallacy of argument from authority I will not be convinced.<
I confess that convincing you may be beyond my capabilities. However, giving a source is not a logical fallacy. Also, appeal to authority is invalid when the reputation of an individual is by itself meant to be justification for believing a conclusion. This is discussion of available evidence from the time, and the evaluations are done by a consensus of unaffiliated historians.
While most of the events of his life cannot be verified, there actually is consensus among historians that a man called Jesus lived in that area at that time, was crucified, and led to the foundation of Christianity.
hbomberguy recently had a video that "ruins" Youtubers who have been very successful from educational videos while using blatant plagiarism. It's 4 hours long but it's very engaging and might be something you enjoy.
Part of the problem is trying to be authoritative with broad conclusions. You can have a documentary cover a story or a person's life while being thorough and entertaining, but things like an overall industry's practices are just too complicated to go over quickly. People are going to have lots of varying experiences with it, and just giving facts about it misses human elements that allow people to imagine being there. It needs to be a story, but just one story also can't apply to everyone.
Cast at Maximum Range Toggle
In this patch we've added a new toggle setting that will affect how champions cast their abilities when the player inputs the command outside of max range. Go to Options > Game > Clamp Cast Target Location within Max Range and BOOM. With the toggle turned on abilities will automatically be cast at max range if the ability was cast outside of the ability's casting range
I have been asking for this for years! It seemed like on the rare occasion it came up, Riot wanted it out of player's hands by design. I would have preferred it be ability-specific like quickcasting, but still this is wonderful!
Yeah, if winters are warmer now than people remember, it's not global warming making a noticeable change.
For perspective, the average global temperature has risen 0.08°C (0.14°F) per decade since 1880. It has increased to (0.18°C / 0.32°F) since 1981, but you still aren't going to feel that.