Ginja

joined 3 months ago
 

SINGAPORE—During Donald Trump’s first term, U.S. companies argued that a trade war with China was bad for Americans.

Businesses including Apple, Nike and small retailers said raising tariffs on imports from China would raise prices for consumers. Farmers and other businesses that exported to China warned about retaliatory tariffs from Beijing.

Now, as Trump prepares for his second administration, American companies have largely gone silent about the importance of the U.S.-China relationship. That is because American businesses no longer see China as the land of opportunity.

The promise of China’s market has faded as its once-booming economy hits trouble. And Beijing and Washington have implemented policies that make it harder for American businesses to succeed in the land of 1.4 billion people.

“U.S. companies are more wary about doing business in China,” said Anja Manuel, the executive director of the Aspen Security Forum and a consultant for American companies doing business abroad. “You see that across all industries.”

In 2023, China trailed only Mexico and Canada as a buyer of U.S. products. American exports to China totaled $147.8 billion that year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Still, that was down about 4% from the previous year. The U.S. trade deficit in goods with China—the figure that looms large in Trump’s mind—was $245 billion in the first 10 months of 2024, according to the Census Bureau.

While many U.S. companies still have big stakes in China, others have scaled back. The American Chamber of Commerce in China, which represents more than 800 mainly U.S. companies in the country, said its members have gone to other countries for new investments.

The big problem is China’s economy, the world’s second-biggest after the U.S. For decades, it grew at nearly 10% annually. It was on track to gain 5% in 2024, but economists say that target will be tougher to hit in 2025.

U.S. companies used to put up with the difficulties of doing business in China, including potential loss of intellectual property and pressure from state-owned companies, because of the growth potential.

Starbucks shows how that has changed. In 2016, then-chief executive Howard Schultz said China could become the coffee company’s biggest market. Since then, Starbucks has been undercut by local chains selling cups of joe for $2 or less, and has fallen behind domestic leader Luckin Coffee.

 

China started the year with a broadside against U.S. defense contractors, responding to recently ramped-up Taiwan arms sales by the Biden administration and laying down a fresh warning to President-elect Donald Trump of tools Beijing can use to protect national interests.

[–] Ginja 4 points 4 weeks ago

Well I'm glad to see someone else was disgusted by that response.

[–] Ginja 1 points 4 weeks ago
68
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Ginja to c/world
[–] Ginja 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)
  ___________
< Devin Nunes >
  -----------
         \   ^__^ 
          \  (oo)\_______
             (__)\       )\/\\
                 ||----w |
                 ||     ||
    
[–] Ginja 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not teaching the local language in schools, to instead force them to use your own is denying it and it is genocide.

Go to China and look at how they are wiping our local ethnicity through exactly that, they are forcing generations to grow up learning Mandarin in schools, legislating that TV must be in Mandarin, etc. and through this they are causing languages like Cantonese to lose their daily usage and thus die off.

It's what a large swathe of Europe did during the 19th and 20th century, where local languages (and their corresponding cultures) were basically killed, e.g. everyone in France basically speaks Parisian France, with only Brittany holding out its culture.

Seems like genocide is not all that horrific in your view.

This is revolting to hear anyone say.

[–] Ginja 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (15 children)

Yes, without a doubt denying children their cultural language and customs is a form of ethnocide/genocide.

[–] Ginja -3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (20 children)

That's literally calling for genocide? You're telling a peoples (who are the victims of an invasion) that they cannot have their own culture because it's similar to an invaders?

[–] Ginja -1 points 4 weeks ago

Good if you've been smart and invested your money.

-62
Cancel culture in Ukraine (www.economist.com)
submitted 1 month ago by Ginja to c/world
[–] Ginja 21 points 1 month ago (8 children)
 

Musa Hasahya Kasera, a 70-year-old Ugandan villager, navigates challenges of 12 wives, 102 children, and 578 grandchildren, facing hunger and limited resources.

[–] Ginja 0 points 2 months ago

Yeah 10,000 years ago they were “immigrants”, back when no one lived on this island.

view more: next ›