+1 for LXQt. But what do you mean XFCE is not ready? Never used MATE, so I cannot tell, but XFCE seemed solid when I used it

Swisscows is the one I use most now days

I'm still trying out different editors from time to time. I always feel like they are lacking in some way in comparison to Emacs. Like, when there's no key binding to focus the list of references, or one cannot navigate to the beginning of a block, or one cannot navigate by subword. Let's not forget sexp. Cannot live without it. Or marks, for that matter. Or proper clipboard history that is properly searchable. It's like the developers has not seen the light yet. Most editors are very mouse driven, and maybe does not focus enough on actual code navigation. I'm biased of course. Though, Helix seems cool.

Side note: Even though I use Emacs, I have nothing against Vim. Heck, I even use it every now and then.

Table locks can be a real pain. You know you need to do the change, but the system is constantly running queries towards it. Now days it's a bit easier with algorithm=inplace and lock=none, but in the good old days you were on your own. Your only friend was luck. Large migrations like that still gives me shivers

This state-o-fart user-experience will transport you to the future of user experiences

I admit. This cracked me up.

We all have different levels of insecurity. I think it's common to not want to hurt the feelings of the ones we love

I second Rawtherapee. I know there's a lot of love for Darktable, but I personally find the results from Rawtherapee better. Both are great applications

Yes! I just could not stop reading this book. Stayed up way too late. Easily worth it

Blockbuster, simply because they (at least used to have) the best pricing, though the app is not very good. Now days I tend to use YouTube more since the prices on Blockbuster has gone up. This is probably a local thing. I guess prices probably differ between diffent regions.

The Kasts podcast player is great

I've only used Caddy as a reverse proxy in production, but on my development machine I use Caddy with php-fpm. That makes me a bit unsure if I understand your questions correctly.

For me that would look something like this:

test.example.com {
	root * /var/www/html
	php_fastcgi unix//run/php/php7.4-fpm.sock
	file_server
}

(Yeah, PHP 7.4, I know)

It looks like your Docker (?) image is exposing the php-fmp socket? I did not even know that was possible, but I don't doubt it is.

Caddy has no issues serving multiple hosts from the same server, it can even be with different php-fpm sockets. Caddy will just nod at you, maybe silently question your choice of still running PHP 7.4, but it accepts it and runs. Just make another block with a different host in the same Caddyfile, and it will work just fine.

Loved that show! Needed to stop after my anxiety levels went to high though :D