BitSound

I'm looking to tag a simple 4 way stop with typical US red/yellow/green traffic signals. I was wondering what the difference between signal and traffic_lights is in iD, and the wiki page just says this about traffic_lights:

A typical traffic signal. This value was the second most common value as of 2021-09-15 despite being undocumented until that point.

Looking at the talk page there, it links to this post, where an iD dev seems rather annoyed at the wiki:

I took a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals and now I'm furious.

Forget it.

There is no way I'm going to support traffic_signals=yes for pedestrian signals, after the wiki folks aren't even ok with iD using traffic_signals=signal for a normal traffic signal - a tagging that was accepted just not very widespread before iD started doing it.

The OSM Wiki needs to end. Seriously. It's ruining this project.

I'm using iD, so should I just leave it as the default signals and leave the fighting up to the devs? As an aside, does anyone know why there seems to be so much animosity there? Kind of surprising TBH

I've encountered a bus stop that still exists, but has a sign from the city saying that no busses stop there. There's the disused tag on the wiki which seems relevant, but I'm not sure how to tag it exactly. There's lots of tags like ref, route_ref, operator:wikidata and so on. Should all of those tags get prefixed with disused:?

I'm trying to correct local buildings on OSM. I've noticed that some of the buildings were traced before according to one set of satellite images, but are off according to others. One of the options for a background while editing that I've got is called orthoimagery. Can I assume that that is the best set of satellite images for tracing buildings from?

I saw this posted in another community, and was very confused for a bit. Can/should they be made to change their name? I'm not really sure how that sort of thing works.

Finished reading the Remembrance of Earth's Past series (i.e. The Three-Body Problem and the other books) and have opinions. WARNING: SPOILERS

Overall I liked it a lot. I felt like the books could've been a lot tighter though, and Liu Cixin really needed an editor. Lots of cool ideas, but I did not care about the 3 old guys arguing with each other in the first part of the second book. It gave some background info, but that could've been collapsed into a few paragraphs. I also didn't need the whole backstory of some some ship's cook whose plot relevance was about 10 seconds long.

I didn't have my mind blown by the ideas in it. Not that I begrudge people that do, I'm just not lying awake worrying about the dark forest hypothesis. Maybe it's because there's not much we can do about it anyways 🤷. I did really like the recasting of string theory's 11 dimensions as not some beautiful reality of the universe, but as the result of brutal galactic warfare.

I thought the FTL communication was kind of weird for a series that mostly tried to stick to (or at least give lip service to) hard sci-fi. If you haven't seen it before, this is a good explainer of the problems with FTL communication: https://projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/fasterlight.php. In the end, I think it more wants to be cosmic horror than hard sci-fi, which is fine.

One minor nit I have is that at the very end they talk a big deal about making messages last for billions of years, and they arrive at carving messages into stone. Good idea, but even then the message got partially lost. Why not add redundancy and carve it multiple times? I also kind of expecting something "clever", like writing the message into the genes of the mobile trees or something.

Full album is coming out Aug. 23rd

Sadly didn't notice it until after the event was over otherwise I would've helped draw it

https://canvas.fediverse.events/#x=899&y=69&zoom=12