BitSound

joined 2 years ago
[–] BitSound 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From what I understand, Ada does not have an equivalent to Rust's borrow checker. There's efforts to replicate that for Ada, but it's not there yet.

[–] BitSound 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That tracks

9
Barred Owl closeup (loops.video)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by BitSound to c/[email protected]
 

Didn't add the R tag because it was uploaded by the OP to multiple platforms, including Loops

[–] BitSound -1 points 2 months ago

Thanks. I'm not intending to push anything here. She has some other interesting articles and I came across this one on her blog while I was reading those. Didn't really see any discussion online about it, and thought this would be a good community for evaluating the claims. I'm coming from a place where I think stuff like this that tries to make concrete claims from data is best discussed and picked apart, especially since it didn't come across as bad faith to me, but I can understand that might not be a view shared by everyone.

[–] BitSound 6 points 2 months ago
 

Fairly simple post, just a few statistics/charts from a single survey. Anyone have an opinion on this?

[–] BitSound 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I like this reaction video for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWUUrdQfjn8

[–] BitSound 20 points 2 months ago
 

That was a laughable election. I would've preferred if Harris had won, because I'm not an accelerationist, but that time is past. Where do we go from here? Can the DNC be dragged back towards the left, or is it done for?

[–] BitSound 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] BitSound 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure if this is what you're referencing, but there's a famous quantum computer researcher named Scott Aaronson who has this at the top of his blog:

If you take nothing else from this blog: quantum computers won't solve hard problems instantly by just trying all solutions in parallel.

His blog is good, talks about a lot of quantum computing stuff at an accessible level

[–] BitSound 24 points 2 months ago

Cross-posted to [email protected], which is probably the closest active community we've got

[–] BitSound 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ha, that reminds me of Donald Knuth offering 0x$1.00 to anyone that finds a mistake in TAOCP, like this guy:

https://nickdrozd.github.io/2019/05/17/knuth-check.html

[–] BitSound 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Does anyone here actually use awk for more than trivial operations? If I ever have to have to consider writing anything substantial with bash/awk/sed/etc, I just start writing a Python script. No hate to the classic tools, but Python is just really nice.

246
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by BitSound to c/asklemmy
 

If you haven't read about it before, the term comes from the band Van Halen, who demanded that there were no brown M&M's backstage. People thought it was just a crazy rock star thing, but David Lee Roth later explained that it had a purpose:

Van Halen was the first band to take huge productions into tertiary, third-level markets. We’d pull up with nine 18-wheeler trucks, full of gear, where the standard was three trucks, max. And there were many, many technical errors—whether it was the girders couldn’t support the weight, or the flooring would sink in, or the doors weren’t big enough to move the gear through.

… So just as a little test, in the technical aspect of the rider, it would say, “Article 148: There will be 15 amperage voltage sockets at 20-foot spaces, evenly, providing 19 amperes … ” This kind of thing. And article number 126, in the middle of nowhere, was, “There will be no brown M&M’s in the backstage area, upon pain of forfeiture of the show, with full compensation.”

So, when I would walk backstage, if I saw a brown M&M in that bowl … well, line-check the entire production. Guaranteed you’re going to arrive at a technical error. They didn’t read the contract. Guaranteed you’d run into a problem. Sometimes it would threaten to just destroy the whole show. Something like, literally, life-threatening.

My Brown M&M atm is AI-generated comments like this (first comment is referencing something like df = ... that they removed from the code, but left the comment, second comment is super useless):

# Assuming df is your DataFrame

# Show the plot
plt.show()

That probably means whoever I got the code from just copy/pasted whatever the LLM spit out, and didn't actually think about the code at all.

What is a small detail that you pay attention to because it means there's bigger issues to watch out for?

[–] BitSound 3 points 2 months ago

Maybe they mean engineers in general? Engineers tend to be over-represented in cults, because "Smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for non-smart reasons."

 

good luck with that lol

 

Someone asked over here about the best way to get into SCP. I listed a couple of my favorites there, but what do other people recommend?

view more: next ›