Oh. That’s a good point. You really showed me how wrong I was. I wish that I were as smart as you.
AnarchoBolshevik
Well, I can thank you for sharing this unique perspective on the matter with me, even though I do find some of its conclusions either unconvincing or bizarre (‘Franchi (whose real name was Edgardo Sogno) was a monarchist, so strongly anti-Communist that after the war he joined very right-wing groups, and was charged with collaborating in a project for a reactionary coup d’état. Who cares? Sogno still remains the dream hero of my childhood.’ Seriously‽), but that still doesn’t justify hostility to a conclusion that’s very easy to reach. The statement ‘Fascism was a form of colonialism’ may be somewhat of an oversimplification, but I gave you some very good reasons why there was nothing ‘utterly ridiculous’ about it.
You didn’t answer my second question whether you know of Fascist Italy’s colonial history or not. So, you already knew of the ‘reconquest’ of Libya, the massacre at Addis Ababa, the forced marriages in Somalia, the concubinages in Eritrea, Benito Mussolini referring to Emperor Haile Selassie as a ‘Bolshevik pig’ in front of a crowd of thousands, and even the unofficial annexation of Tavolara in 1934?
On a side note, respectable scholars such as Robert Paxton would consider Iberia’s 20th century anticommunist régimes to have been at best parafascist, in part because they weren’t adventurer‐conquerors, but also for more complex reasons. For example:
After 1945 the Falange became a colorless civic solidarity association, normally referred to simply as the Movimiento. In 1970 its very name was abolished. By then Franquist Spain had long become an authoritarian régime dominated by the army, state officials, businessmen, landowners, and the Church, with almost no visible fascist coloration.^8^
(Source.)
Are you joking? Every scholar of Fascism will tell you that Fascist Italy inherited numerous colonies from the prefascist period: the Dodecanese Islands, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia, and arguably a portion of Tianjin, and later Fascist Italy added Fiume in 1924 and Albania, Ethiopia, and Tavolara in the 1930s. The very expression ‘mutilated victory’ was quickly adopted by the Fascists because they were outraged that the Kingdom of Italy didn’t gain more territory from World War I. Did you seriously not know this?
From the Dodecanese Islands to Libya, to Eritrea, the Italian state’s colonial holdings were testing grounds for strategies of governance and repression that would characterize [Fascist] domestic and occupied territories during World War II.^13^
(Source.)
Honestly, I’d be unsurprised if a lot of neofascists appropriate neopaganism simply for nationalistic reasons and not because they take it seriously.
Unfortunately I can’t access the post now, but basically there was a neopagan on Reddit who theologically explained to me how Norse paganism actually had a neutral or positive stance on phenomena that neofascists despise, such as interracial relationships. Most (if not all) white neofascists have a piss‐poor understanding of the lore and just assume that European paganism must have been good because it was European and less Semitic than Christianity.
in the 90’s.
So during or after the destruction of the Soviet Union… interesting coincidence.
The Russian Federation planted false documents in the U.S. State Department…?
That…
…is a good point, actually. Oops!
The image seems to be missing.
During the African slave trade, South Carolina received more slaves than any other mainland colony. As many as 260,000 enslaved Africans entered South Carolina from 1670 to 1808. Most of those slaves disembarked here, at Gadsden’s Wharf, located on the Cooper River in Charleston, between today’s Calhoun and Laurens Streets and from the harbor to East Bay Street.
The wharf complex was built in the 1760s and 1770s by Christopher Gadsden, a prosperous merchant a Revolutionary War leader known today for having designed the Don’t Tread on Me flag known as Gadsden’s Banner.
(Emphasis added. Source.)
The leading anti‐London rebel, Christopher Gadsden—like Laurens, his fellow Carolinian—was immersed in the issue of slavery. He was a trailblazer in terms of forging “white unity”—bonds forged between and among European settlers across class and, at times, ethnic and religious lines—in the face of a [black] majority.
It was a variation of the longstanding argument that the—actual—cutthroat threat from Africans should be sufficient for such unity, that is, that the prospect of slave insurrection should remind the white poor of their presumed identity of interests with their racial brethren, who happened to be filthily wealthy planters and merchants. Gadsden’s view was that the élite should at least be seen as fulfilling obligations to those who were less affluent.
Without this maneuver, he said, it would be “little less than madness” to keep importing Africans.^88^ Thus, in South Carolina near the same time, far‐reaching apprehension was expressed about the presence of so many Africans, referred to by one observer as “an Internal Enemy that one day may be the total Ruin” of the province.^89^
(Source.)
Little is said, though, about the Gadsden flag’s ties to the Confederates, who embraced it in their own fight against federal authority. From 1860 to 1862, the battle over Gadsden symbols resembled modern meme wars. Ultimately, the Union sacrificed Gadsden’s rattler — because Confederates had irreparably tainted it.
(Source.)
I am most definitely not into fellation, and yet I never accuse anybody of figuratively or literally performing it. Funny that.