640kb

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Hey, stop bashing linux:)

[–] [email protected] 64 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I can still remember running Windows 3.1 on my Windows 98 Pentium machine (booted into DOS 7.0). The sheer responsiveness... In a blink of an eye the system was ready, apps would open. The last time I felt this kind of responsive speed was running KolibriOS: http://www.kolibrios.org/en/

I've run plenty of low resource OSes/Distros on low-end hardware but... there's nothing sweeter than running low resource OSes on high end hardware - it feels like the future (the way it was suppose to be).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Google accomplished step 1 and they failed on step 2. So... no.

Facebook being the entrench monopoly and Google+ being the new competitor. Unlike Facebook, Google tried to bulldoze their way into a new market.

Instagram and Threads/Twitter have user bases of a similar mindset. Google never had a user base that was of a Facebook (social media) mindset - they have a ton of randos. They tried to convert these randos into real people (social media) by forcing the Real Name policy at the time (ie, bulldozing their way into a new market).

They think their failure with Google+ was because there was already a monopoly in place. Their failure was that they were trying to get one mindset interested in something completely different. Meta generally applies a similar formula - creating and cultivating the social media mindset. Each company (each new brand) adding to the whole. Their core users respond to the new companies because it's stuff they are already interested in. It worked like a charm with Threads.

The Metaverse was (too much) a departure from that mindset and we saw how badly that turned out (3 billion users or not). So Step 1, Step 2... sorry, no.

I think Google could follow this (meta) playbook and create new brand names (TikTok & On Demand Streaming) instead of hiding these services within the general Youtube brand. In the same way Meta just did with the Instagram to Threads conversion. I still think this was impressive and even moreso that they didn't let the Metaverse disaster make them timid (Like Google+ did with Google).

(edit: clarity)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Not a fan, at all, of Meta/Facebook but the way they rolled this out - by tying it to instagram - was/is impressive.

The other big tech firms are taking lots of notes - especially those that have big user bases. Because this is how you roll out a new competitor to an entrench monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

the extension would be even more interesting if it could work on any link on the web:

A disqus replacement? Now that would be interesting indeed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I don't think there's a single "main" computer anymore. My home computer is Linux Mint Cinnamon. My mobile computer (which I use nearly as much as my desktop OS) is Android.

My next smartphone is going to allow installing a privacy-respecting custom ROM (because Linux on mobile really isn't there yet). Once I do that, I'll focus on f-droid apps only. Something to look forward to.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Reddit used to be able to do two things. 1. Allow me to express myself and 2. Entertain. They really stopped entertaining me a long while ago. They also didn't engage me enough for me to want to express myself. I already had a foot out the door.

Point 1 is filled with Hacker News, Lemmy and tildes. They are all similar but different. With lemmy... you kind of take your shoes off and relax (respectfully). With HN and Tildes: you are the best version of yourself.

Point 2 is taken up by TikTok. I use TikTok on an older dedicated secondary tablet with a fake gmail account, no contacts. The tablet only does TikTok and nothing else in order to alleviate privacy issues, etc.

HN, Lemmy, tildes and TikTok provide an experience that far surpasses that of reddit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can't believe that with the API pricing the way it is, it's financially viable to continue developing this app. It only makes sense if Spez offered this (and some other developers) a backroom deal (complete with NDA).

Spez has shown himself to be a lying, vindictive douche. If he can make Christian Selig look bad (for exposing reddit and Spez himself for what he is), it's something he would appear to relish. The way Spez doubled-down on his vindictive and defamatory statements during the AMA just goes to show that there's no level he won't sink to.

Also, if the API pricing was lowered - it's a last minute sign of (quietly) back-tracking given the immense backlash it has caused.

The initial API pricing was meant to drive out all reddit clients. It seems to me that reddit clients still operating after July the 1st have received (much) lower API pricing (or are not being charged at all - in the case of RedReader). It's just too expensive otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Agreed. The only reason I found Liftoff was because of this post (List of lemmy apps): https://lemmy.ml/post/1466515

It still doesn't show up for me on when I'm on Google Play.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That, or Christian made a pretty expensive mistake...

I wouldn't put a lot pass /u/spez, including offering special deals on API pricing. Especially if he thinks it would make Christian Selig look bad.

It's precisely the kind of thing a lying, gaslighting and vindictive /u/spez would do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it was 'Starship Troopers'.

 

First ever meme...

view more: next ›