Lemmy.World

171,974 readers
7,577 users here now

The World's Internet Frontpage Lemmy.World is a general-purpose Lemmy instance of various topics, for the entire world to use.

Be polite and follow the rules โš– https://legal.lemmy.world/tos

Get started

See the Getting Started Guide

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Liberapay patrons

GitHub Sponsors

Join the team ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Check out our team page to join

Questions / Issues

More Lemmy.World

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Mastodon Follow

Chat ๐Ÿ—จ

Discord

Matrix

Alternative UIs

Monitoring / Stats ๐ŸŒ

Service Status ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

Mozilla HTTP Observatory Grade

Lemmy.World is part of the FediHosting Foundation

founded 2 years ago
ADMINS
ruud
Thekingoflorda
lwadmin
Rooki
AutoMod
kersploosh
MrKaplan
doccod
lwreport
bannanaente
listing: all - local
search
1
-21
Test results of head to head of AI chats with web access: [ChatGPT4 browser] vs [ChatGPT4 and 3 plugins] vs [Bing Creative] vs [Bard] (imgur.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by YellowtoOrange to c/chatgpt
3 comments fedilink
 
 

I was becoming very frustrated with the slow speed (often over 1.5 - 2 min) of ChatGPT4 w/ browser, so decided to test it against it's competitors including some times until the response is completed (though onenote crashed and I lost most of the timing data).

  1. ChatGPT4 with browser - usually takes 1.5-2 min
  2. ChaGPT4 with [Web Requests] plugin around 1:30 to 5 min
  3. ChaGPT4 with [WebPilot] plugin 0:50 to :130
  4. ChaGPT4 with [Access Link] plugin - around 50 sec
  5. Bing Creative - around 40 seconds
  6. Bard - 5-7 seconds

These are screenshots of a table on a 4k monitor, so if the type is small, try downloading the images and zooming in. Tried exporting to PDF but the results were broken PDFs.

The chatgpt4 browser and it's web plugins often failed to give results or broke and sometimes gave decent results.

Which would you use?

2
-12
Test results of head to head of AI chats with web access: [ChatGPT4 browser] vs [ChatGPT4 and 3 plugins] vs [Bing Creative] vs [Bard] (imgur.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by YellowtoOrange to c/[email protected]
0 comments fedilink
 
 

I was becoming very frustrated with the slow speed (often over 1.5 - 2 min) of ChatGPT4 w/ browser, so decided to test it against it's competitors including some times until the response is completed (though onenote crashed and I lost most of the timing data).

  1. ChatGPT4 with browser - usually takes 1.5-2 min
  2. ChaGPT4 with [Web Requests] plugin around 1:30 to 5 min
  3. ChaGPT4 with [WebPilot] plugin 0:50 to :130
  4. ChaGPT4 with [Access Link] plugin - around 50 sec
  5. Bing Creative - around 40 seconds
  6. Bard - 5-7 seconds

These are screenshots of a table on a 4k monitor, so if the type is small, try downloading the images and zooming in. Tried exporting to PDF but the results were broken PDFs.

The chatgpt4 browser and it's web plugins often failed to give results or broke and sometimes gave decent results.

Which would you use?

view more: next โ€บ