Lemmy.World

166,306 readers
7,276 users here now

The World's Internet Frontpage Lemmy.World is a general-purpose Lemmy instance of various topics, for the entire world to use.

Be polite and follow the rules โš– https://legal.lemmy.world/tos

Get started

See the Getting Started Guide

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Liberapay patrons

GitHub Sponsors

Join the team ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Check out our team page to join

Questions / Issues

More Lemmy.World

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Mastodon Follow

Chat ๐Ÿ—จ

Discord

Matrix

Alternative UIs

Monitoring / Stats ๐ŸŒ

Service Status ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

Mozilla HTTP Observatory Grade

Lemmy.World is part of the FediHosting Foundation

founded 1 year ago
ADMINS
1
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4333257

Professor Philip Moriarty takes issue with a paper by scientists claiming to achieve room temperature superconductivity.

The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008

Key critique points:

  • Team has little to no background in superconductivity
  • Evidence of levitation can be explained without superconductivity
  • Graph showing drop in resistance uses a scale which is orders of magnitude off the scale
  • Graph showing drop in resistance shows it does not drop (close) to zero

Phil regrets this bad publication which received so much attention could have a negative impact on credibility of science as a whole.

The relevancy for 'Science Communication' is: This video claims to focus on why this was bad science, how safety checks failed, and what negative impact this communication failure might have.

2
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4333257

Professor Philip Moriarty takes issue with a paper by scientists claiming to achieve room temperature superconductivity.

The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008

Key critique points:

  • Team has little to no background in superconductivity
  • Evidence of levitation can be explained without superconductivity
  • Graph showing drop in resistance uses a scale which is orders of magnitude off the scale
  • Graph showing drop in resistance shows it does not drop (close) to zero

Phil regrets this bad publication which received so much attention could have a negative impact on credibility of science as a whole.

3
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4333257

Professor Philip Moriarty takes issue with a paper by scientists claiming to achieve room temperature superconductivity.

The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008

Key critique points:

  • Team has little to no background in superconductivity
  • Evidence of levitation can be explained without superconductivity
  • Graph showing drop in resistance uses a scale which is orders of magnitude off the scale
  • Graph showing drop in resistance shows it does not drop (close) to zero

Phil regrets this bad publication which received so much attention could have a negative impact on credibility of science as a whole.

4
 
 

Professor Philip Moriarty takes issue with a paper by scientists claiming to achieve room temperature superconductivity.

The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008

Key critique points:

  • Team has little to no background in superconductivity
  • Evidence of levitation can be explained without superconductivity
  • Graph showing drop in resistance uses a scale which is orders of magnitude off the scale
  • Graph showing drop in resistance shows it does not drop (close) to zero

Phil regrets this bad publication which received so much attention could have a negative impact on credibility of science as a whole.

view more: next โ€บ