this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
270 points (97.9% liked)

Colorado

1212 readers
1 users here now

All things Colorado

Let’s go Nuggets! 2023 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS

Go Avs Go! 2022 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. All hail Blucifer

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Interesting development here in Colorado regarding Trump and the 14th amendment.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wogi 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Fight to get him disqualified in enough states to prevent him from winning the primaries.

But, importantly, not all of them.

Prevent the GOP from coalescing around a single candidate, and they don't stand a chance in 2024

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

This is already getting appealed to the Supreme Court, so it's going to get fully resolved one way or the other. I can only hope they uphold the Colorado Supreme Court ruling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

@Wogi 👍🏻👍🏻

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Still gotta see what SCOTUS does.

[–] derekabutton 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Not relevant here, because states decide how their ballots are run. It's similar to how some states can prevent felons from voting for life.

[–] Rusticus 8 points 11 months ago

They already stayed their decision until Jan 4 to give the SCOTUS time to rule on this.

[–] cowfodder 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the 14th amendment to the Constitution of The United States of America isn't relevant here...

Adding /s because some people don't understand context.

[–] andrewta 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If it's not relevant then why did they stay their decision until scotus can rule?(If Trump decides to take it to the Supreme Court)

[–] cowfodder 5 points 11 months ago

Did you really not read the comment I was responding to, or should I have added /s to it because some people are incapable of understanding context?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A lot of felons* may not have the money machine to pay the lawyers to fight all the way to the Supreme Court. And there’s also the supremacy clause, so idk, which is why I’d like to hear from a con law pro, attorney or paralegal.

  • That was an embarrassing autocorrect.
[–] PedroMaldonado 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Uuuuugh! Why is this a surprise? WE ALL SAW IT ON JAN 6TH! DUDE WENT ALONG WITH THIS SEDITIOUS BULLSHIT! THANKS FOR WRECKING DEMOCRACY FOR US, JERK.

[–] Mr_Blott 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Narrator - "Fact is, they were foolin themselves if they thought they ever had democracy "

[–] Lycerius 7 points 11 months ago

This isn't going to go how we want. It feels good now, but it's essentially a free ticket for the most right wing court in decades to rewrite/reinterpret the 14th ammendment...