this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
184 points (96.5% liked)

World News

38487 readers
3280 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There were no billionaires aboard.

[–] nieceandtows 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean, a luxury super yacht literally saved 100 people from the sinking ship.

[–] Ensign_Crab 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In summary: They were deliberately ignored by Greece because they weren't rich enough to care about, requiring private charity to step in and with its limited capacity only rescue a fraction while the rest remained ignored by Greece, and drowned.

I can be grateful for the charity while still disgusted at the lack of action when compared to the outpouring of support for 5 nitwit billionaires in a deathtrap.

[–] nieceandtows 3 points 1 year ago

Totally agree with you on that.

[–] allotrope 10 points 1 year ago

Blizzard that the NYT article didn't mention this at all, almost instead implying that the coast guard did most of the rescuing.

While it seems the ship saved 100 of the survivors.

[–] Widowmaker_Best_Girl 3 points 1 year ago

Can't let facts get in the way of feelings though!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

But this is Lemmy we must hate the billonaires

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

No one helped because it would have put the onus on dealing the refugees on them. Europe is just as shit as the US is when dealing with undocumented migration.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Proposed: The UN establishes a sort of Selective Service that automatically enrolls every billionaire. When their card is pulled, they have to present themselves to be the search & rescue mascot of a migrant vessel.

[–] Locrin 2 points 1 year ago

If you want to help you can contact Greece and say you want to house and feed some refugees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can't read the article because of paywall, but I'm not surprised by the title. The other worldwide pandemic we've been suffering from for much longer than a few years is apathy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Here is a gift link (subscribers can share 10 articles per month).

Full article

[–] badtooth 2 points 1 year ago

Copy and paste the link into printfriendly.com and you should be able to bypass the paywall. Will work for pretty much any site 👍

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you're using Firefox you can click the reader view button and the article is readable again so it seems to be a soft paywall, otherwise archive.is works

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article paints it as Greece saying they would handle it, then sending a small coast guard boat with a four man special operations team with weapons.

Basically everyone assumed Greece would handle it in a humanitarian way, instead they let the boat sink and arrested some of the survivors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Basically everyone assumed Greece would handle it in a humanitarian way

That may be more the way the article presents it - Frontex infamously replaced a more humanitarian approach under the guise of "cost savings" and then over the years grew their budget beyond what was spent on border crossings before they came into the picture, and now is under increasing scrutiny over how they just watch migrants die or even push them back - the Mediterranean border crossing is said to be the deadliest in the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Frontex infamously replaced a more humanitarian approach under the guise of "cost savings"

Isn'y it more like he moved the money to a pocketable one under the disguise of "cost savings"? Because that's how these things usually work for politicians and bureaucrats.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

They knew the risks?