this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
557 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

32173 readers
483 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Who really does hope something from the "DnT"

While the ruling against LinkedIn is a welcome development, I'm skeptical it will truly move the needle on respecting user privacy. Do Not Track has been around for years, yet sites continue ignoring it without consequence. This case may set a precedent, but it's one isolated judgment in Germany.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ironically this site serves koko analytics, which now ignores the Do Not Track header (as per Mozilla's recommendation, mind you). See commit 6890f3c.

Thankfully uBlock Origin blocks loading the scripts.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Honestly, DNT as it's implemented in browsers today is not a sufficient solution

I've come to the same conclusion (blogged about it here https://www.srcbeat.com/2023/11/linkedin-do-not-track/) after updating myself on where it's all at.

I also think about pop-ups back in the 90s/00s. Imagine if browsers sent a "No-Popups" header (or something) back then. I doubt we would have seen any change in company behaviour. Instead, it took something like Firefox to implement pop-up blocking by default (https://lwn.net/Articles/130792/).

[–] Dran_Arcana 3 points 1 year ago

We could certainly un-depricate it. It's not like we need to reinvent the wheel here as a society on this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Lmao, thanks for the share XD

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope someday DNT would not be an additional part of your digital fingerprint nailing you down as a part of a minority who turn this shit on.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

thats clearly an risk, they can use this to determine what they want to see.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Btw, most of the tracking scripts use dnt as additional data point, since it's opt-in and most don't have that set.

[–] fluckx 18 points 1 year ago

It's a step. I'll take the win. Hopefully other countries follow.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

How much are they being fined for this violation?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Crazy DNT is a thing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Users must expressly agree before their profiles can be visible to non-members.

Wait the law encourages authwalls? Isn't that worse?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, it encourages something called "consent".

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That could do both ways tho.

I dont consent to Facebook and LinkedIn making my profile invisible to internet users who dont have an account with them (which on those platform it is not possible to register and account anonymously)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok but LinkedIn and Facebook don't have a duty to broadcast what you want all over the internet.

They don't need consent not to share personal information, only to share it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, I disagree with that. I think we need laws that require companies to allow anonymous users to access their content, with few exceptions.

[–] DetectiveSanity 1 points 9 months ago

I think that is a bit of a tall order don't you!?