That's not true!
Some of them got rich from war profiteering - not stealing from poor people, but stealing from vulnerable people until they get poor.
That's not true!
Some of them got rich from war profiteering - not stealing from poor people, but stealing from vulnerable people until they get poor.
Unpopular opinion: it's more of a coping mechanism for the third world countries.
Sure UK and much of Europe had big and terrible colonies but there were still many like sweden and norway which did not. Thus the assertion that developed countries all have built upon exploitation is not entirely true
Assertion 2: countries such as china have shown that economic development is possible when you have a terrible history of war, destruction or otherwise poor economic background. Sure personal freedom is a joke in China but to say it isn't an economic giant is false. Poland after ww2 is another example, much of their intellects were killed and warsaw was everything but ruins at the end of 1945
Assertion 3: geography, the age groups of the people and culture all affect the development of a nation much more than their history from 80 years ago.
- from someone who has keen interest in history and lives in a third world country and seen corruption, bribery and every form of idiotic economic decision that a government can make to not let the country be a better place.
Why don't the poor people just get rich? Are they stupid?
Lolol just ignore those pesky stats and raising people out of poverty over the last 75 years.
Raising people in their own country
My country has a high standard of living, because even poor people can buy nice things because they are made by slave labor in very poor countries.
So we went from being material poor and joy rich to just materially rich..
Communists hate this one