this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
9 points (90.9% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3248 readers
1 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge

You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email [email protected] (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud
MrKaplan
jelloeater85
lwadmin
Serinus
9
Clarification on new user rules (self.support)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GONADS125 to c/support
0 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I don't have a problem with rule 3, but I would appreciate clarification from the admins if possible.

  1. No posts or comments supporting or promoting conspiracy theories. Our team has the sole discretion to decide if a specific content violates this rule. Birds are real. Earth is round. Get over it.

I agree with this policy, and I am sick and tired of misinformation on covid and vaccines. What I would like clarification on is whether I would be mischaracterized as a conspiracy peddler for sharing this well-cited information below on UAP that I have worked hard gathering?

https://thereflectiveequilibrium.blogspot.com/2023/10/an-exhaustive-analysis-of-compelling.html?m=1

I can imagine some people erroneously reporting this information as a conspiracy theory, despite the fact that I have provided citations from legitimate sources.

I hope that I can get confirmation because I don't want to be banned for sharing this information.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here