Movies and TV Shows

5229 readers

7 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!

Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [[email protected]](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)

Related communities: [email protected] [email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

100

Scott Pilgrim Takes Off | Official Trailer | Netflix (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Awesome! I loved the comic, I liked the movie, and it looks like the same people are back for the cartoon, I will gladly watch this exact same plot again.

They're all such a good characters, and I'm so glad that Kieran Culkin is Wallace again, he was perfect in the live action movie.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's wild that they got the entire cast back, and yet they seem to be telling the same basic story again? Or maybe that part of the trailer is from a sort of recap in the first episode and the story movies on from there? Otherwise it's like a remake with the same cast, and that's pretty wild, but cool.

[–] ieightpi 3 points 1 year ago

It sounds like the basic story beats will be the same, but they plan to Switch it up. So also the anime? Graphic Novel? Comic? Wasn't done yet when the movie came out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=dLvRvqByxUI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[+] [email protected] -39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

i did never understand why the liveaction movie was so hyped. it was kinda sexist af ngl

[–] nuzzlerat 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the film doesn't explore it as well as the comics did, but the story is about scott being a shitty, under-developed 23 year old. he is confronted with his past and forced to reckon with how terribly he has treated the women in his life. scott is supposed to help ramona defeat her evil ex-boyfriends but is faced with that prospect that he could become one if he doesn't become a better person. i'd really recommend reading it as the film gives the wrong impression of the story

[–] blattrules 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is pretty much the same impression that I got from the movie.

[–] nuzzlerat 3 points 1 year ago

that's good, i can't really remember the movie tbh. i just see a lot of people who misrepresent the story are usually talking about the movie

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I just saw it as Scott going after a girl and getting her in the end. Didn't really notice any other message at all, so I'm curious if it'll come through in the show. (haven't read the comics)

[–] blattrules 4 points 1 year ago

That’s definitely a fair take on it. It’s definitely all in the movie, just maybe not the primary focus of the movie. He’s definitely a selfish bastard throughout most of the movie and then realizes it at the end and is redeemed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Scott Pilgrim is an immature, self-centered little dork with the biggest case of literal main character syndrome. He's a dick to everyone, and that includes being sexist. That's the character, not the movie.

I understand your confusion though, because the entire narrative is built around Scott's delusions. All of his insecurities and foolish notions are played out as if they are reality, because for the intent of this story as an internal reflection of Scott's psyche, they are.

[–] KuroiKaze 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, I particularly also felt that Michael Cera was a disastrous miscast, especially since like one of the first things you hear in the book is that Scott Pilgrim is known to be the toughest fighter in his entire province. They really should have went with Jesse eisenberg at the very minimum.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Michael Cera is the best casting for this character because we can immediately see who he really is right from the start. There's no illusion for the viewer that he's actually cool. He pretends to be cool, he aspires to be, but he sucks and he knows it - though he doesn't realize how apparent that also is to everyone around him.

In a comic you can convey that quickly through text and other means, but if you want to let the audience in on how tragically lame he truly is right up front, there's nobody better at that than Michael Cera.

[–] nuzzlerat 2 points 1 year ago

yeah i'm gonna agree and it's also the fact that scott is supposed to be attractive and charming (not to make a dig at michael cera), which is why is can get away with being a loser