172
submitted 11 months ago by YoBuckStopsHere to c/politics

CNN has exclusively obtained the audio recording of the 2021 meeting in Bedminster, New Jersey, where President Donald Trump discusses holding secret documents he did not declassify.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] YoBuckStopsHere 47 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

That's the good shit.
When reading the post I thought it's one of those "We got the tapes/videos/mails, but won't upload them, but we got them and they are important, believe us" things.

[-] rDrDr 1 points 10 months ago

member when Rachel Maddow got his tax returns?

[-] AFKBRBChocolate 41 points 11 months ago

It’s so completely clear from the audio that he knows he’s sharing classified information and that he no longer has the power to declassify it - there’s no doubt whatever - but there will still be a giant number of people will say he’s innocent.

[-] stochasticity 11 points 11 months ago

They are indifferent to his guilt. They don't have to deny it.

[-] Omegamanthethird 1 points 10 months ago

I mean, isn't the story now just that it's "boring" and "who cares?"

[-] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

Remember that every time you read a comment online saying Biden and Trump are the same, you’re looking at a pro-Trump psyop.

[-] stochasticity 7 points 11 months ago

I found a pro trump mastodon instance the other day and I have it bookmarked so I can check in every now and then. That shit is absolutely wild.

[-] outrageousmatter 19 points 11 months ago

Damn, thanks CNN for helping the feds with there job of winning the charges.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

This is a tape already known to be part of the prosecution's evidence as far as I know.

[-] meldroc 3 points 10 months ago

Jack Smith's ace in the hole. Note that he didn't file charges about this specific dissemination - that way if Judge Loose Cannon causes too many problems, he can file these charges in New Jersey, out of her reach.

[-] outrageousmatter 2 points 11 months ago

Ah, yeah sounds like a pretty simple violation of something in his charges.

[-] what 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Trump to go to jail. Trump win in 2024 all but confirmed.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere 11 points 11 months ago

There is no rule that says a person in prison can't run for office. Eugene V. Debs was in a West Virginia penitentiary when he lost the 1920 presidential election after all.

[-] Cruxifux 7 points 11 months ago

Eugene Debs was too awesome to ever win an American election though.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I'm sure the guy getting the cokes has a security clearance, not a US one, but a security clearance is a security clearance, right?

[-] meldroc 3 points 10 months ago

He cleared that staffer with his mind!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

He'll claim it's deep faked

[-] khepri 2 points 10 months ago

He already claimed it exonerates him, can't have it both ways.

[-] Clipboards 4 points 11 months ago

Doesn't get much more direct than this...

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
172 points (100.0% liked)

politics

17789 readers
5135 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS