this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Android

27933 readers
165 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

[email protected]


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

How to:

Features:

  • no bricking - if you remove essential app you will need to do factory reset, but that's it!
  • auto detect previously uninstalled apps if you've already removed any using adb

Screenshots:

https://i.imgur.com/3uuMvVJ.png

https://i.imgur.com/ScByjdz.png

https://i.imgur.com/fAwxCRn.png

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you will need to do factory reset

Or you could just reenable the app with adb. ๐Ÿ™„ This isn't doing anything you couldn't do with a one-liner.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yes, but as this app is designed for people like me who don't have access to other hardware then factory reset would be my only option.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why just not use universal android debloater?

[โ€“] TooMuchVanced 10 points 1 year ago

If you don't have a desktop you can't use it so to have something that does the same that you can use on mobile is pretty cool.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Can someone eli5 what Shizuku is? I keep hearing about it on a number of Android App YouTube videos as well.

[โ€“] TooMuchVanced 3 points 1 year ago

The app lets you use system features that are normally not available for regular apps. Basically it runs a service which has access to some System API's that can be granted to regular apps so think of it like you would have root without having root.

[โ€“] kadu 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's just a on-device GUI for the built in debugging tools, which might be used to grant permissions apps can't usually request by themselves.

It's like USB ADB, but on device.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From their readme:

For the project as a whole, it is not free. You are FORBIDDEN to distribute the apk compiled by you (including modified, e.g., rename app name "Shizuku" to something else) to any store (IBNLT Google Play Store, F-Droid, Amazon Appstore etc.).

I don't get it?

[โ€“] tordenflesk 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What part of "don't steal out shit" is hard to understand?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Redistributing modifications or otherwise modifying, improving and sharing software isn't stealing...

Their "exception" basically defeats the point of the free license it uses (Apache2.0). It's more source-available than libre or open source, thinly veiled by the Apache license at the top of the project. I find it interesting that they chose a free license to base it on in the first place if they then go on to invalidate a good chunk of it's user protections.

If they really don't want people to pass off other work as theirs, they could have just used the 4-clause BSD license, with it's advertising clause, or Apache 1.0, also with an advertising clause (not great for libre licenses, but would fit and wouldn't be quite so bad as what they've done).