this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
76 points (76.4% liked)

Open Source

28971 readers
569 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Without having to watch that video..

What is a voice app?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Speech to text.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/UCGaKvZpJYc?si=SXknCynbr_7pakmC

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Love these kinds of projects. Recently been using this FOSS STT app on degoogled phone: https://github.com/ElishaAz/Sayboard (see releases for APKs)

Which has been great because I went years without STT.

This Futo looks promising with the punctuation. Now only if they publish to fdoid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Wow! Thank you, this is awesome!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What is incredible about this product is that I can speak normally and fluently as I normally do.

The need to look at the output as you speak is only necessary if you expect there to be errors. FUTO, amazingly, performs extremely well in this regard and I have a high confidence in not being able to trip it up. I don't feel that I need to look down at a live transcription.

This whole comment was written using FUTO voice input. I'm definitely going to donate to them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This whole comment was written using FUTO voice input.

Was the device owner involved?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

he was not, nobody cares about his 2 bytes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is not free software. See license.

Subject to the terms of this license, we grant you a non-transferable, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to access and use the code solely for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

In other words, I can't download the code, reskin it and sell "Bob's Voice to Text" for $1.29 on the play store. Seems reasonable to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

But, if I understand correctly, you cannot create your own fork and modify the code to improve it / alter features. Right? Then it's not FOSS.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Amendment; it seems the other FUTO product has a 10 purchase. So it's not free, but seems to be winrar's approach. "Please pay, but if you don't we won't know"

Assuming my understanding is correct;

By the spirit of the definition, no.

By the literal definition - ~~yes; it's free and the source is open to look at. You could fork it, but you can't sell your own version.~~

No, free in FOSS stands for libre or independent, not the financial definition. Due to the license restrictions, the software is not "free".

I have no idea if you could redistribute a modified version freely without breaching the license terms - enforcement is key. The language could be there just to prevent any of the big tech companies from just forking and profiting from the work.

This is purely speculation, and shouldn't be considered fact.

[–] Jocarnail 1 points 9 months ago

Does anyone know if it works with android auto?