this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
73 points (82.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9887 readers
4 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This might be an unpopular opinion but I feel like public parks should have less parking or smaller parking lots. Having a big lot destroys the very nature people are coming to enjoy. I've also noticed it leads to people just driving to the park and not even getting out of their cars. I've seen so many people just eating lunch in their cars by themselves, it's so sad.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that only works well if public transit can pick up the slack, otherwise people will, ya know, have trouble getting there.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The ideal solution is to have more parks. When there's many parking lots there will many people too. Sometimes even crowded.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As someone that has eaten my lunch in my car at a park…it is way more enjoyable than Walmart. Sometimes just that little amount of respite is all people can afford or have time to enjoy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Yes, absolutely, but that has to come with accessible, comfortable, and affordable public transit alternatives. Otherwise you just make parks inaccessible.

[–] Velkas 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do you want to get rid of public parks, because that's how you get rid of public parks. Lol

I'm in rural West Virginia/Eastern Kentucky. If people couldn't drive and park at Parks, there'd be no park traffic. Like, the parks here, no one would be there as there's no other mode of transportation that's viable. No public transport, way too damn far to walk/run/bike and I'm sure not getting my boat out to go down the river to the local park.

Also, I frequently take my spinning wheels to the park to spin with a few other people. I'm not packing a 20 pound spinning wheel and a mound of wool with my spinning accessories a country mile to the park lol. People do go there for other reasons than to sit and look at an overweight squirrel gorging itself on a bag of salted peanuts someone left it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Definitely not unpopular here

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I know I was wish I could just park my car at a scenic view the other day tbh, but the parking lot it's self did really detract from the view. If bike paths were more common, I'd love to sit on my bike and just eat a sandwhich looking at the trees/water.

[–] Adori 4 points 2 years ago

Thats definitely one of the steps, probably one of the later ones rather than the firsts.

There needs to be alternatives to driving within the area first.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I worry this would further class decide in some ways. Where I am all the best green space is in the rich parts of town, the poorer folks need to drive. The little green-space poorer areas do have isn't as well maintained either. I think this is coming at the problem from the wrong end, this should be the last step not the first.

[–] CannaVet -3 points 2 years ago

It took zero time for fuckcars to be overrun by petrosexuals on Lemmy JFC 😂