this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
303 points (98.7% liked)

Rust Programming

8197 readers
18 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you haven't heard the news, Reddit is making some drastic, user-hostile changes. This is essentially the final stage of any ad-supported and VC-funded platform's inevitable march towards enshittification.

I really love the /r/rust community. As a community manager it's my main portal into the latest happenings of the Rust ecosystem from a high-level point of view primarily focused on project updates rather than technical discourse. This is the only Reddit community I engage directly with; my daily fix of the Reddit frontpage happens strictly via login-less browsing on Apollo, which will soon come to an abrupt end.

This moment in time presents a unique opportunity for this space to claim its independence as a wholly community-owned operation. If the moderators and other stakeholders of /r/rust are already discussing possible next moves somewhere, please point other willing contributors like myself in the right direction.

I'm ready to tag along with any post-Reddit initiative set forth by the community leaders of this sub-reddit. Meanwhile, I've started mobilizing willing stakeholders from the fediverse, which I believe to be the path forward for a viable Reddit alternative.

Soft-forking Lemmy

Lemmy as an organisation has issues. But the Lemmy software is a fully functional alternative to Reddit that runs on top of the open ActivityPub protocol, and it's written in Rust.

Discourse, the software which the Rust Users/Internals forum runs on also supports basic ActivityPub federation now, so the Rust Users forum could actually federate with one or more Lemmy-powered instances. As such, this wouldn’t just be a replacement to Reddit, it would be a significant improvement, bringing more cohesion to the Rust community

Given Lemmy's controversial culture, I think it's safest to approach it with a soft-fork mindset. But the degree to which any divergence will actually happen in the code comes down to how amenable the Lemmy team is to upstream changes. I'd love for this to be an exercise in building bridges rather than moats. I know the Lemmy devs occasionally peruse this space, so please feel free to reach out to me.

Here's what's happening:

  • The author of Kitsune is attempting to run Lemmy on Shuttle, which in turn have expressed interest in supporting this alt-Reddit initiative.
  • We're also looking into OIDC/OAuth for Lemmy, which would allow people to log in with their Reddit/GitHub accounts. If anyone would like to take this on, let us know!
  • Hachyderm is starting to evaluate Lemmy hosting next week. I personally think they could provide an excellent default home for a renewed /r/rust, as they are already a heavily Rust-leaning community of practitioners.

To facilitate this mobilization, I've set up a temporary Discord server:

https://discord.gg/ZBegGQ5K9w

I'll gladly replace this with e.g. a dedicated channel on the Rust community discord. One big upside of having our own server is that we can bridge it to a self-hosted instance of Revolt, which we'll do in the next few days.

Lemme know if this resonates with you!

u/erlend_sh

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hydra 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is essentially the final stage of any ad-supported and VC-funded platform’s inevitable march towards enshittification.

Nope, I think the enshittification started well before since the mid 2010s, with the new design and the slew of increasingly user-hostile changes that started rolling ever since. But now with the public trading attempt and VC capital drying up everywhere it seems that all the big tech corps are slamming the gas on the enshittification machine.

Either way as a budding Rustacean I'm all for migrating to Lemmy. It means future proofing the community thanks to fediverse capabilities.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wow, didn't know the people making Lemmy were that bad and deny genocides. But I also don't have time to read and understand all the old posts, and I have no idea who the people are who are talking abotu this, so it is incredibly hard to say if it is trustworthy or not. Would be interesting to get a statement from the lemmy developers today about this, to see what they think about the uighur thing and north korea today.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I feel like it's completely overblown and it's just silly. Why can't we let these people have opinions different from our own?

It's like we are looking for something to fight about, instead of using the tech because it's actually really valuable.

Divide and conquer... Every single time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You've pretty much described social media in general right now. "If you don't agree with me then you are the enemy and I will silence you!" There are no "difference of opinions" because it's easier for people to think in terms of black and white. Now there are limits. Don't promote hate and violence. Your words have power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Opinion is one thing, spreading propaganda from terrorist states like China or North Korea is another.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Opinions that are unacceptable to you" still count as opinions, by definition.

Also nobody is forcing their opinions on you or the whole community, they even sticked a post on top that says "it's full here, don't join".

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where's the actual questionable content? All I could find was a Mastodon thread claiming the devs have shitty opinions without any links to any actual people raising these opinions. The best I can do is guess they are referring to lemmygrad, which indeed looks like a brain dead shit hole of insanity, but how does that relate to the developers again? A bit more clear-cut presentation would be greatly beneficial, as this level of discussion is FUD as best.

[–] croobat 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ditto, I see people everywhere but not actual evidence from the developers. Best I could find was some questionable essays in the main dev's Github, but so what? If I buy clothes through Shein now I am some child labor apologist? If we keep rejecting people with good ideas for having shitty opinions we will die waiting.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Link to the said essays, so it's clear what we're dealing with here: https://github.com/dessalines/essays

Ok, so the guy likes his communism. I do find it weird (and a bit stupid), but he can't control the instances he hasn't started, and doesn't directly benefit from them. So it's very hard to see the problem here.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

I don't think his political views are relevant in the first place. As long as he's a great developer and nice to work with, there is no problem for Lemmy and its users.

People really need to stop doing this thing where they disagree with something someone says just to discredit everything else that person does.

[–] croobat 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think people may be overreacting a bit, the whole point of federated social media (and FOSS software), is that nobody really owns anything. This is not like if the CEO of some company did shady business or something, personally I couldn't care less.

[–] PixelPlumber 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My concern is that he will use his admin powers in relevant subs ([email protected]) to suppress relevant topics there. I don’t think that requires forking in itself, but might justify defederation to help alternative groups grow.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Certainly that's a fair concern, but we had shitty moderation in Reddit too. Whatever Lemmy grows into is largely up to us users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't believe it will happen when the devs themselves mention this in the docs and are clearly opposing it.
It's reasonable to have the same sub on alternative instances just in case, but I don't think defederation is appropriate when there isn't many users in total since that would kill the community before it forms.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm as in the dark as you are, but I think part of the complaint is that

1 Lemmy.ml still federates with lemmygrad.

  1. Lemmy.ml and lemmygrad seem to be hosted on the same machine.
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why the hate against lemmygrad? Just let them have their opinion. Have they done anything wrong to you personally? No? Then let them be. At least this is how I like to think about it.

Also, are we really going to start witch hunts for instances that federate with an instance that you don't like?

[–] PropaGandalf 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. As a libertarian I leave the freedom to anybody to say anything they want. As long as it does not interfere with my freedom let them do or say whatever they want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'd send you an All-Seeing award, if this was another site :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I see, this could be a concern regarding the moderation policy of Lemmy.ml. However, if there is some unhinged upfuckery, unlike in the case of Reddit, we don't have to migrate to a completely new service, just to another instance.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not about to defend their opinions but to me, I don't see how they matter. It sucks that I wouldn't find the devs to be ethical in that case, but I care far more about this federated platform. As long as they keep it to their own instance and keep developing an open platform for others, I don't know that it's relevant.

[–] Kamelo 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I completely agree with this, the entire point of federated services is if you don't want to share the website with edgy internet socialists you just don't join one that ends in .ml. It's not like only the best people in the world use Reddit...

[–] Homeopathicsuicide 2 points 1 year ago

I thought that for upstream changes you need to work with them? So the soft fork

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The enemies of lemmy are trying to slander the devs with ridiculous claims. They will always claim genocide because they want to associate everything with nazis and the holocaust. It's an old tactic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@m532 @Sibbo Are you implying that a piece of software has “ennemies”? Why would that be? Your statement is more confounding than anything else. Are you saying in your last two sentences that the Chinese government has not been oppressing the Uyghurs?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Are you implying that a piece of software has “ennemies”?

Well yeah, Lemmy has direct competitors

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

https://lemmyrs.org/c/rustlang seems to me a more reasonable instance and home for r/rust than lemmy.ml/c/rust

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I can't help reading it as "crust".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@v_krishna @Veritas
In the future surely but lemmyrs is very new, so do not unsubscribe from c/rust jet :D

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I'd love a way to have user preference to merge multiple communities (from my pov) for exactly this issue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

@v_krishna I believe it is already this way if the communities on different instances are called the same.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Personally think it would be more reasonable to have rust at this instance. https://programming.dev/c/rust

I hope the devs might make a pin at a directory of communities they can join like a unified directory of all instances and in those instances, the communities they have. I think that way rather than seeing the most popular instances, users would join those communities from their instance however the popularity of such an instance and community can sometimes act identifier for making decisions which instance they would join in also which community. So idk like maybe having a directory by interest might help others to encourage to join those communities from their home instance rather than registering as new user at every instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That has the disadvantage that it's moderation policies may not be in line with the rust code of conduct. But having independent communities next to the official one would be great anyways, to facilitate independent discussion.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

agreed, should move to programming.dev

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Rust programmers....

Someone want to revive Lemmy-lite?

https://github.com/IronOxidizer/lemmy-lite

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m thinking of copying my Threads subreddit already have one in Squabbles but Dosent have the same customization that Reddit has https://www.reddit.com/r/Threads1984/ Tried creating one for Lemmy but then it said https://www.reddit.com/r/LemmyMigration/comments/1462pe7/what_is_the_requested_format/ But I’m going to try creating the Threads Lemmy on the desktop

Update it worked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

r/rust is private

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A lot of comments in this post have reminded me of how many people wanted to ban RSM from the FSF he himself founded, and most of those people don't even know him, neither understand the values he believes in and defend.

At any rate, the current banning culture is pretty nocive, and so is the mono culture we live in, and are not even aware most of the time. Thankfully there are already multiple lemmy instances for people to join, and there will be more. And one can always contribute upstream (it's up to the devs to accept MRs/PRs), and do testing on one's instance. However AFAIK, [email protected] as well as many other technical communities, don't really include that much political conversations, and the few that show up on those tech communities, can be ignored, or one can get involved, that's up to oneself, but the point is not to just go ahead and judge a good way to share, and in particular [email protected] has been very good this far.

This same thread, which wasn't deleted or banned, actually is one of the few political ones. I just hope it doesn't end on having to search on so many rust communities that it defeats the purpose of link aggregation...

load more comments
view more: next ›