Yeah, I'd guess this is the real reason driving many companies to force a return-to-office. Nothing to do with productivity at all; just shoring up their property values.
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
16 points (90.0% liked)
Technology
58142 readers
4810 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
100% that and tax breaks for having people in the city for work.
Back in 2015 I did an analysis for the company I was working for of how much it cost for each employee based in our largest office (central Sydney).
It was pretty detailed, all insurances, utilities, staff amenities, even factored in the 2-3 accidental fire brigade callouts we averaged a year! Literally the complete total cost averaged out for each person.
The numbers blew me away. It showed that even if staff working from home were 35-40% less productive, we'd still be ahead if we didn't need to provide them with office space in the centre of the city.
At that point I though, oh shit, one day companies like this aren't going to give us a nice city centre office are they....
I figured there would be a shift over the next 10-15 yrs as companies started thinking about this and WFH became a bigger thing. But COVID will have accelerated things
I reckon we will eventually move from a situation where WFH is like a privilege, to one where being provided a decent permanent office to work out of will be the privilege. One probably reserved for only the most senior staff.