this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
-12 points (38.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

30003 readers
690 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A person can be killed instantly through many different means.

As we know it, to be killed painlessly, is to be killed instantly.

If you instantly destroy a person's entire brain then they died without pain.

Yet the most effective ways of instantly destroying someone's entire brain are considered inhumane.

If instantly killing someone by smashing their head with a massive rock, or shooting them in the brain stem is inhumane, then there is no humane way to kill someone at all.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daddyjones 11 points 1 year ago

As we know it, to be killed painlessly, is to be killed instantly

This is not necessarily true. There are ways to fall asleep and never wake up. Not instant, but painless.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why did you think killing someone (murder) could ever be humane in the first place?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the death penalty exists.

Because people are currently sentenced to execution even in the United States.

To those humans who are sentenced to death, why not choose a method that is instantaneous death, rather than something that can potentially fail.

I'd rather die instantly from a rock or a 12 gauge shell to the head than be injected or electrocuted.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is a tip: The world is not the USA...

If you are complaining about something that happens in the USA, say so.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, there is no humane way to kill someone.

But on the USA death penalty issue, yes, generally choices about how it is carried out, are made with the spectators in mind, and the process itself is made more torturous in order to make it look better. (John Oliver has some great information in his death penalty video)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What about when it's their choice, like euthanasia?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And (afaik) with the executors mental health in mind as well.

e.g. if you just crush a head with a stone you will know you did it.

If two others and you have to push a button you can tell yourself that it's more probable you didn't kill somebody than that you did.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The key metric for 'human' actions is to avoid needless suffering. Livestock processed humanly is not panicked, not given a slow painful death, it should be quick, clean, and without pain.

Living conditions are human if they don't create needless suffering, i.e. animals living in a open farm are human, animals living their lives in changes is inhumane.

I think the golden rule applies, treat others how you would like to be treated, is basically being humane.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I think the golden rule applies, treat others how you would like to be treated, is basically being humane.

What if you are a masochist?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well you certainly chose an appropriate username.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Careful, you might to get crucified for ths opinion.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That would be inhumane

[–] elephantium 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oof, -11. This should have been posted in [email protected]

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I posted it there as well but people tend to be very touchy about human death regardless of circumstances.

I for one don't care what condition my body is in after I die as long as physically I didn't feel anything.

[–] elephantium 1 points 1 year ago

That makes me think of the Klingons from Star Trek "It is only an empty shell; do with it as you will."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Inert gas asphyxiation is considered as painless.

Accordingly, the human subject detects little abnormal sensation as the oxygen level falls. This leads to asphyxiation (death from lack of oxygen) without the painful and traumatic feeling of suffocation (the hypercapnic alarm response, which in humans arises mostly from carbon dioxide levels rising), or the side effects of poisoning.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

ITT: Psychopaths failing to understand that not all people are psychopaths.