this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
422 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19141 readers
2372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The irony of the background saying Restore Sanity

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Well, it’s a start. No money for federal judiciary, federal House, federal Senate, and eventually federal Presidency. And federal law enforcement, and federal military. News from the Florida Man

[–] alienanimals 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Removing the IRS so the poor could stop paying taxes (just like the ultra rich) would be great. Also, fuck DeSantis.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure, just remove the department that manages the nations nukes, nbd.

[–] glitch1985 3 points 1 year ago

Just have the nuclear weapons program under the department of housing and urban development.

[–] ViewSonik 2 points 1 year ago

Yep.. More evidence, not that we needed it, that he is a complete moron

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's so weird seeing the IRS as one of the more prominent victims of partisan polarization, especially with a ridiculous enough promise even we libertarian-minded folk tend to react along the lines of "whoah that's pretty crazy to jump to, the budget is a system that needs adjusted with care even if - especially if - that's your goal". It's as if he's trying to cater specifically to really dumb business owners.

I fail to see how rah rah DoE/DoC even makes sense as a campaign promise.

[–] CharlesDarwin 5 points 1 year ago

Ding-a-lings say the darndest things.

Everyone should treat this guy's ideas about how to run a government about as seriously as they would on fashion tips from ronnie - those white go-go boots were sure fashion-forward, LOL.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I become more and more convinced that DeSantis is to make Trump palatable again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • How do you know a US president is lying?

  • His lips are moving.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Some are able to write as well. Not all, really 😅

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

How will the government get money? I mean no IRS means no taxes.. right? Wut

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›