this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
114 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59710 readers
5729 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
114
USA Today and Other Newspapers Are Churning Out AI-Generated Sports Stories (futurism.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/technology
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lede AI, the company powering Gannett's AI sports efforts, is supplying a number of local news publishers with the same service.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I'm a helpful AI and automation tool," reads the Auto News Desk's bio. "I collect, analyze, and deliver information like high school sports scores and real estate transfers. My job is to help the newsroom deliver lots more useful information while freeing up their time to do important human-powered journalism."

You know, it's bad enough that they're using these godawful services to the detriment of both writers and readers alike, but what I particularly dislike is that all these shitty LLMs are being humanized with biographies and cute little names. Like little cheery mascots celebrating the death of human-powered industries.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish that more people were talking about universal basic income in response to this.

[–] EnglishMobster 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've been literally saying this for years. Yang had the right idea, and every year it becomes more obvious.

Most industries will be automated within 10-20 years, or so transformed as to be unrecognizable. I'm not just talking about stuff that can be done by AI art tools or a future version of ChatGPT (which is in itself a large chunk of the economy). There's also logistics (self-driving trucks, trains, taxis, planes, and boats), there's food service (burger-flipping robots are already a thing), there's groceries (robot stockers and self-checkouts), there's hospitality (Japan already has automated hotels), there's construction (we already see robots at construction sites), etc.

Within a couple decades I see no reason why these jobs would still be commonplace. Compare the world of the 1980s and 1990s to the world of today. Computers in the 80s and 90s are comparable to AI today, and in 2040-2050 I see no reason why we wouldn't be living in a completely different world.

It's true that some jobs will simply transform - programmers might become prompt engineers, for example. But many jobs will be eliminated completely, and I don't buy the argument that people will just find new things to do. At a certain point, people will be automated out of the economy - to borrow an analogy from CGP Grey, the invention of the stagecoach may have been great for horses... but the invention of the car was less great.

I firmly believe that UBI is the only way forward, long-term. COVID already worked as a trial for it, and we're seeing the economy contract in part because it stopped (in addition to other things, e.g. the Fed).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Earlier this week a regional Ohioan newspaper called The Columbus Dispatch, owned by USA Today publisher Gannett, was met with a slew of online backlash when it was discovered that the paper was using a generative AI system to produce awful, bottom-of-the-barrel synopses of local high school sports matchups.

The AI-generated pieces embody the worst that AI-powered journalism has to offer: formulaic and repetitive short-form blurbs, riddled with nothingstuff descriptors — including the AI's widely-mocked use of the phrase "a close encounter of the athletic kind," which of course means absolutely nothing — and providing little in the way of quality information about the event, other than who played and what was the final score.

"A suffocating defense," reads an automated blurb from Herald & Review, an Illinois-based paper owned by Gannett rival Lee Enterprises, "helped Franklin South County handle Bloomington North 4-0 on Aug. 30 in Indiana girls high schools soccer action."

"A suffocating defense," proclaims an excerpt from the Cox Enterprises-owned Atlanta Journal-Constitution, "helped Nahunta Brantley County handle Garden City Groves 30-0 in a Georgia high school football matchup."

"A suffocating defense," reads yet another local sports article from the Philadelphia-area outlet Vista.Today, whose owner, American Community Journals, operates several digital papers in the region, "helped Upper Dublin handle Kennett 21-0 in Pennsylvania high school football action on Aug.

American Community Journals, the Philly-area publisher, simply attributes its stories to the "ACJ Sports Staff," with no mention of "artificial intelligence," "AI," or "automation" found anywhere on the page.

The original article contains 1,207 words, the summary contains 249 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] NoisyOne57 1 points 1 year ago

We need a footballer named Glorbius Globin