this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
114 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59711 readers
5789 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lede AI, the company powering Gannett's AI sports efforts, is supplying a number of local news publishers with the same service.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish that more people were talking about universal basic income in response to this.

[โ€“] EnglishMobster 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've been literally saying this for years. Yang had the right idea, and every year it becomes more obvious.

Most industries will be automated within 10-20 years, or so transformed as to be unrecognizable. I'm not just talking about stuff that can be done by AI art tools or a future version of ChatGPT (which is in itself a large chunk of the economy). There's also logistics (self-driving trucks, trains, taxis, planes, and boats), there's food service (burger-flipping robots are already a thing), there's groceries (robot stockers and self-checkouts), there's hospitality (Japan already has automated hotels), there's construction (we already see robots at construction sites), etc.

Within a couple decades I see no reason why these jobs would still be commonplace. Compare the world of the 1980s and 1990s to the world of today. Computers in the 80s and 90s are comparable to AI today, and in 2040-2050 I see no reason why we wouldn't be living in a completely different world.

It's true that some jobs will simply transform - programmers might become prompt engineers, for example. But many jobs will be eliminated completely, and I don't buy the argument that people will just find new things to do. At a certain point, people will be automated out of the economy - to borrow an analogy from CGP Grey, the invention of the stagecoach may have been great for horses... but the invention of the car was less great.

I firmly believe that UBI is the only way forward, long-term. COVID already worked as a trial for it, and we're seeing the economy contract in part because it stopped (in addition to other things, e.g. the Fed).