this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
230 points (99.6% liked)

Australia

3582 readers
125 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBananaKing 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy crap, an actually almost-sane decision?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The bureaucrats normally do.
It takes a politician to say something like “The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia,”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, it's so sad that I can believe that someone actually said that

[–] Anonymousllama 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, parents can do their fucken job and monitor their kids. Stop offloading all the burden for your poor parenting onto the general public

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You act as if parents have time to be parents these days.. (queue the typical "well you shouldn't be having kids! the human race should just die out!")

[–] blue_zephyr 23 points 1 year ago

As any sane legislator will do. Having to show your face or ID to watch porn is some Orwellian level government control. It's the parents job to regulate their children's internet activity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The federal government will not force adult websites to bring in age verification following concerns about privacy and the lack of maturity of the technology.

On Wednesday, the communications minister, Michelle Rowland, released the eSafety commissioner’s long-awaited roadmap for age verification for online pornographic material, which has been sitting with the government since March 2023.

The federal government has decided against forcing sites to bring in age verification technology, instead tasking the eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, to work with the industry to develop a new code to educate parents on how to access filtering software and limit children’s access to such material or sites that are not appropriate.

The roadmap said there was also a gap in sex education, particularly for LGBTQ+ people, with online pornography filling the place in many cases.

“The government supports this approach, and will work with the regulator to ensure the full and successful implementation of the Online Safety Act,” she said.

“While the government awaits the outcome of this process, the digital industry is on notice that we will not hesitate to take further action should it fail to keep children safe.”


The original article contains 630 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Come on, we all know the real reason this is not being forced through. The politicians don't want to provide their ID to all the porn sites they visit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

good, a fair and sensible decision, now lets just sit and wait for the conservative media to spin this in their usual ridiculous ways