this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
96 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

59116 readers
3262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Self-driving cars have flooded San Francisco's streets, and not everyone is happy. Street activists have been using a low-tech solution to incapacitate the vehicles.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not sure what they're trying to show though.

You also can render a human driven car immobile but standing in front of it and have a buddy come up from behind. And what does that prove other than you're asshole? I don't see how this activism is different.

[–] sab 9 points 1 year ago

The way they explain themselves sounds like NIMBY. I doubt it's about safety.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

They're trying to show it's hilarious. And they succeeded.

[–] sab 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I couldn't help but note the lack of figures of how unsafe driverless cars are, versus a regular car, per distance driven. And for that matter - how much that number had changed over recent years - because that's the entire point of these tests, to make traffic safer.

And when scooter companies flooded the sidewalks with electric scooters, people threw them into San Francisco Bay.

Ah, that happened here as well. But we just call it vandalism.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


An anonymous activist group called Safe Street Rebel is responsible for this so-called coning incident and dozens of others over the past few months.

The group's goal is to incapacitate the driverless cars roaming San Francisco's streets as a protest against the city being used as a testing ground for this emerging technology.

She points out that when tech companies test their products in the city, residents don't have much say in those decisions: "There's been various iterations of this where it's like, 'Oh, yep, let's try that out in San Francisco again,' with very little input from anyone who lives here."

Safe Street Rebel has cataloged hundreds of near misses and blunders with Cruise and Waymo vehicles over the past few months — even without traffic cones.

Those incidents include driving through yellow emergency tape, blocking firehouse driveways, running over fire hoses and refusing to move for first responders.

"The traffic cone protest is an example of how things in the real world can really confound machines, even ones as sophisticated and finely tuned as this," says Margaret O'Mara, a history professor at the University of Washington who studies the tech industry.


The original article contains 1,091 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!