Jevon's paradox says this might not help. If shipping gets faster, cheaper, and cleaner, because ships get free power on top of their engines - are we likely to do less of it?
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
42 points (92.0% liked)
Solarpunk
5393 readers
1 users here now
The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.
Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Are we likely to do less of it careening off the cliff, though? Because nothing has slowed it yet..
Besides, I feel like the maintenance and, probably, management of it would require a separate fund so it might not be cheaper for the shipper, but hopefully cheaper than the fines for not implementing it (assuming we stick with capitalism which.. meh, we shouldn’t anyway, it’s pretty exhausted at this point)
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Now imagine the same concept applied to a 1,000-square-meter kite, flying 300 meters above the water – only instead of towing a surfer across the waves, it’s helping to propel a colossal cargo ship across the ocean.
That’s the basic idea behind the Seawing, a technology being developed by French company Airseas, which it says could help cargo ships reduce their fuel consumption, and cut their carbon emissions by an average of 20%.
Powered predominantly by fossil fuels, the shipping industry accounts for around 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the International Maritime Organization – which is why there’s an urgent need for change, says Airseas co-founder and CEO Vincent Bernatets.
Its flight is controlled by autopilot software that operates from a box beneath the kite, which is in turn attached to the ship by a 700-meter-long cable that provides power and sends data to and from the vessel.
For more than a year, a 250-square-meter version of the Seawing has been tested on a cargo ship chartered by Airbus (which owns a minority stake in Airseas), sailing across the Atlantic.
Dr. Richard Pemberton, a lecturer in Mechanical and Marine Engineering Design at the University of Plymouth, in the UK, believes that “there’s an absolutely no question that it’s technically possible” for the technology to work.He points out that German company SkySails developed and tested a similar kite-based propulsion system for ships more than a decade ago.
The original article contains 996 words, the summary contains 238 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
This is a technology that has been on the horizon for decades, but has only ever been used on a handful of vessels.
If the benefits are as great as claimed, why isn't this the standard everywhere?
Personally I would assume because it’s a pain in the ass to maintain, when fossil fuels are less so and not presently heavily penalized.
I mean really, wind was the original seafaring option, so we already know it can be harnessed that way, but the current capitalist framework rewards doing things cheap at the expense of the planet.
Cargo ships use real bad fuels, anything would help, it just needs to be required or cheaper than polluting alternatives.
Having technology like this to reduce fuel emissions is a great solution, but the market wouldn't accept cargo vessels that will show up whenever, depending on on the wind.
It’s a supplement, not a replacement, so that’s ok.
Looks like internalized costs for this rather than the externalized costs for fossil fuels. Only regulation can truly fix that.