this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

15551 readers
52 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Sh1nyM3t4l4ss 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have a feeling they're slowly but steadily moving from deb packages to snap-only completely. Because unlike what Mark Shuttleworth said when they abandoned Unity, Canonical doesn't let their users decide which technologies should catch on. The Linux desktop as a whole is moving to a Flatpak future for desktop apps, yet Ubuntu keeps pushing Snaps down their users throats whether they want it or not and sort of "fight" Flatpak on Ubuntu spins.

I get it, Snaps are more versatile than Flatpak, you could make everything on the system a snap (can't ship a DE or the kernel as a Flatpak now, can you) and CLI programs as Flatpaks also suck compared to snap (and distro packages obviously), but for desktop apps Flatpaks are just the obvious choice and the Linux community has shown that.

I'm waiting for the day where you can install Flatpak as a snap on Ubuntu lmao

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The ultimate paradox. I hate when Ubuntu automatically searches for a snap package whenever I use APT

[–] motorheadkusanagi 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's actually vwry convenient for developers on ghe server and enterprise side of things, and that's why they push it so much. The problem is it sucks for users, and it sucks for server admins, last I heard. Even though the slow startup times are not an issue on the servers.

[–] motorheadkusanagi 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flatpak or just docker would be better. Snap is redundant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The main use for snaps comes from having controlled updates for packages that can't be isolated, like the kermel, but surely it would be better to keep such packages as native debs. Personally, I can't see an advantage for it. In theory, it's a universal package format, but who cares that it works everywhere when nobody uses it because of the issues it has. And I definitely agree that Docker is better for enterprise server stuff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the only reason I stopped using Ubuntu and switched to plain old Debian + GNOME. I want nothing more to do with snap.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think that debian is a very valid choice for everyone, even for newbies who want to move to something freer than Ubuntu

[–] Oddbin 4 points 1 year ago