this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
119 points (96.1% liked)

memes

12959 readers
5476 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CryptidBestiary 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] That_One_Demon 10 points 2 years ago

He's a racist and sexist piece of shit. His legacy is still being used to push the "good 'ol boys" mentality and toxic Christian evengalicalism.

[–] killeronthecorner -1 points 2 years ago
[–] Diprount_Tomato 15 points 2 years ago

Try finding a Mongolian dude in 1950s America

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

1956 was racist as hell though.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Racism was pervasive in 1956. Still is, but it used be to too.

[–] SonnyVabitch 6 points 2 years ago
[–] Etterra 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hollywood did not hire people who weren't white, unless they were black and used for a black role, and not always even then, for a very long time. Even today there are representation problems in Hollywood and in other media in general. In other words, America is racist, nice of you to notice.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As somebody who immigrated to the US, I came to conclusion that a lot of the world is far more racist. US is just openly fighting that so it is much more visible.

[–] Ghoti_ 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The US is probably the least racist country or at least a top contender.

People don’t get that there’s going to be problems since we have sizable populations of people from pretty much every country

The US openly fights racism like you said

We’re very vocal about when the US f’d up in the past

Our news is broadcast and talked about everywhere since many parts of the internet have a US bias

And the US cares about trying to have a semblance of equality

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree! While its going to be an unpopular opinion:

I've lived on all continents save two and I believe the USA is the least racist country in the world by a massive margin, now this dosent mean that systematic racism is not a problem in the US, I'd argue its a bigger problem here than in other parts of the world. Other parts of the world thst are, weirdly enough. More racist!?

If you stop to consider the amount of hate being spewed in America on a daily basis toward people of various skin colors, weather directly so online or more covertly using coded language on news, The US would definitely appear very racist.

But I've lived here in various states, all over the US save the west coast, for almost a decade now, and Americans are by far the least racist people around thst I've encountered that number more than a couple million.

I belive the average American is very prejudiced however, especially against other Americans who happen to be black. Especially if they also sound or dress black.

Really anyone who sounds or dresses in a non-white way.

[–] frostphunk 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What I got from your post is ‘the least racist American is very prejudiced against none white people”

So American still America, America still racist

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Why I don't find your response very discussionable. This post isent supposed to be here. That was supposed to be a reply to a completely different thread/parent comment somewhere else!?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

We have a state advocating for the positives of slavery. America is atill incredibly racist, it's just a lot more open than in Europe since we have a way more diverse population than them.

[–] Diprount_Tomato 3 points 2 years ago

'Murica and racism, name a more iconic duo

[–] Son_of_dad 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At least this movie killed him

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

John Wayne himself attributed his cancer yo his 5 pack a day smoking habit.

[–] crypticthree 8 points 2 years ago

Out of a cast and crew of 220, 91came down with cancer, and 46 died

[–] scarabic 7 points 2 years ago

I love that Paul Mooney bit on Chappelle’s Show where he laughs about Tom Cruise playing the leading role in a movie called The Last Samurai. He says “Here’s a movie I want to see: ‘The Last N——r on Earth.’ Starring Tom Hanks!”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ever seen Breakfast at Tiffany's?

[–] PetDinosaurs 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yes. particularly bad.

I'm sure I'll never understand that movie or why so many college friends (early 2000's) loved it.

That's ok, though. Aside from this, I doubt I'll think of it for another decade.

[–] Anamnesis 1 points 2 years ago

Wow, jeez, never seen this before. Terrible.

[–] Astroturfed 3 points 2 years ago

I'll be invading China now.... Pilgrum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

"The bomb that killed John Wayne"

[–] Fwoggey 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Or Alec Guiness playing Prince Fasial in Lawrence of Arabia

[–] Diprount_Tomato 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
[–] SonnyVabitch 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Diprount_Tomato 2 points 2 years ago

Close enough.

[–] Fwoggey 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think it really matters if he looks like the actual dude. It's rude as hell to pick a generic/famous white guy to portray a non-white historical figure. Some stills of him look really similar for sure but actually watching Lawrence of Arabia he just looks like someone rubbed dirt or bronze on his face and called it good enough

[–] Diprount_Tomato 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Many "white people" definitely could pass as Arabs so I don't know what you're talking about.

Like, the only perceived difference between "white and non-white" is literally a few kilometres of water

[–] Fwoggey 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sorry to confuse you. White and non-white was a blanket term because this post is also about John Wayne portraying Genghis Khan. If you really don't understand why an English actor portraying an Arab prince or an American Actor portraying a Mongol can be problematic then this all must be very confusing for you...

[–] Diprount_Tomato 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I do understand that it's hard to find a white American that looks like a Mongolian, but it's definitely not hard to find "arab-passing" whites

[–] Fwoggey -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The likeness isn't the point or even what I'm trying to explain. In fact, I agree that they share a basic likeness. Again... If you really don't understand how an English actor portraying an Arab prince or an American Actor portraying a Mongolian can be problematic then you've missed the point, again. The point is that Hollywood in the 50s/60s hire famous actors, that really have no connection to the aforementioned historical figures, over actors that do. I'm sure there were many incredibly talented actors that are actually from east Asia that would've been a better fit to play Genghis Khan. Same for finding an actor from the Arabian Peninsula. These people were robbed of the chance to share their heritage over an actor with a bigger name and pull.

[–] Diprount_Tomato 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Again, it's a fucking movie, not a life or death situation for "non-white" people. If an actor kinda looks like a certain historical character and does a good job at portraying it it's OK. Again, the white American portraying a Mongolian part definitely doesn't follow at least one of these conditions.

[–] Fwoggey 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Next up "Florida man defends holywood using black-face to the death" citing " just as long as the actor did a good job" yehaaaw

[–] Diprount_Tomato 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Fwoggey 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Go it. So Black-face sounds absurd to you but Brown-face or Yellow-face doesn't.

[–] Diprount_Tomato 1 points 2 years ago

Dude stop fighting that strawman. I just said that people may look like historical characters that aren't of their ethnicity, and it's fine to have them as them in a movie. Like, Rami Malek is of Egyptian ancestry and he portrayed Freddie Mercury, who was a Parsi (descendant of Zoroastrians in India), but he did a good job and was well characterized in Bohemian Rhapsody

[–] Madison420 2 points 2 years ago

How about Iron Eyes Cody playing the famous crying Indian commercial though he's Italian and spent most of his career running actual indigenous peoples out of Hollywood.