Lazy-loading is exactly the opposite of pre-loading 😅
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)
Voyager
5430 readers
12 users here now
The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.
Rules
- Be nice.
- lemmy.world instance policy
Sponsor development! 👇
💙
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Lazy loading is definitely used for exactly this. I’ve done similar stuff in react native. You load “just what you need” which is a couple of thumbnails more than can be seen.
They don't need to cancel each other out.
Lazy loading usually means to load the image at a lesser quality to have something to show the user very fast, so yes technically this can be called opposite of pre loading if used solo.
Pre loading in this instance usually means loading before the user sees the image.
These 2 things can be used together, an example could be to lazy load images at a low quality that are further down the feed before you scroll to them, and load the full image as you get closer to it/have it show on the screen.
But I'm sure the devs knows about thease tricks already
Given the non-commercial nature of Lemmy it's worth considering how much strain this would put on instances. It's all a balancing act of user convenience and cost to instance owners and I wonder how much Lemmy apps consider this. I don't have strong opinion on either approach, just my $0.02.
It should barely put any strain at all in all honesty. It’s not preloading all thumbnails, but perhaps the next 10-15 or similar.
Most of the time these would be loaded anyway. It’s only the time when you’re finished scrolling it’ll be 10-15 thumbnails that are loaded and not seen.