this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
333 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18888 readers
3988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Atlanta-area prosecutors have indicated that they will go before a grand jury early next week to present the results of their investigation into election interference by former President Donald J. Trump and his allies, raising the possibility that within days Mr. Trump could face a fourth criminal indictment.

On Saturday, two witnesses who have received subpoenas to testify before the grand jury — Geoff Duncan, the former lieutenant governor of Georgia, and George Chidi, an independent journalist — revealed that they had received notices to appear before the grand jury on Tuesday. A spokesperson for the Fulton County district attorney’s office, which conducted the investigation, could not be reached for comment on Saturday.

A state-level indictment of Mr. Trump in Georgia would follow closely on the heels of a federal indictment, unveiled this month, that is also related to the former president’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. But unlike with federal convictions, Mr. Trump, if re-elected president, could not attempt to pardon himself if convicted of state crimes in Georgia.

Moreover, while the federal case brought by the special counsel Jack Smith names only Mr. Trump, details have surfaced suggesting that a Georgia indictment could name numerous people, some of them well known and powerful, who played roles in the multipronged effort to help Mr. Trump overturn his narrow 2020 election loss in the state.

Mr. Chidi informed The New York Times on Saturday that he had received the notice to appear. Mr. Duncan on Saturday told CNN, where he is an on-air contributor, that he had received the notice to appear.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Acronymesis 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] jeffw 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Best part is this would be a state trial, so cameras can go in!

[–] Acronymesis 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh shit, that’s right! And you just KNOW the Orange One will try to turn it into a circus. 🤡

[–] BrrooklynMan 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

he IS the circus.

the three (wedding) rings, the freak show (of a family), the hall of mirrors (of election fraud claims), the clown show (of supporters), the (legal) trapeze act, AND the elephant (in the room)!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The Elephant, indeed.

[–] HR_Pufnstuf 2 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for the live commentary thread here on Lemmy. mmmMmmm, this just sounds delicious!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've seen rumors that Willis will seek more than a dozen indictments. That means that there will be quite a number of people charged.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's really not a rumor at this point, she informed the courts to set aside an entire week just to deal with the indictments. That's a lot of time just for that.

[–] TwoGems 6 points 1 year ago

What about these pieces of shit?

https://archive.is/dAnTm

^16 Republicans tried to over throw the elections

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

OKay so what happens if someone on the grand jury is like harcore MAGA and they refuse to agree with the evidence? Can they still indict him?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Certainly.

While a trial jury must reach a unanimous vote to convict, a grand jury only requires a majority vote of 12 or more to approve an indictment. Furthermore, only 16 of the 23 jurors have to be present.

https://www.georgiacriminallawyer.com/grand-jury-indictment

[–] morphballganon 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ideally anyone terribly biased would be dismissed. Counsel for each side get to dismiss several potential jurors.

I was recently in a grand jury selection pool, and I admitted that I had some bias in favor of one of the sides. The counsel for the other side dismissed me, which was fine with me, as I was not thrilled to be there in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

But I think you will have a hard time finding enough people who do not have a bias towards Trump.

[–] NetCaptive 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump may not be able to pardon himself, but Kemp can pardon him, right?

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The last time this came up, people pointed out that the GA governor does not have pardon powers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh wow! that must really make Trump nervous then haha

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's almost certainly one of the reasons he started campaigning so early, so he would be able to bitch about "election interference" and other nonsense during the trial(s) he knew were coming.

[–] the_kung_fu_emu 1 points 1 year ago