this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
194 points (98.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35557 readers
898 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Someone forgot that bike lanes should actually have space for a bike. And maybe not cobblestones.

Legally, combined footpath/bike lanes over here should have a minimum width of 2.3m. Between line and tree there is less than 0.8m.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dougas 21 points 1 year ago

This is not mildly infuriating. This is extremely infuriating. But at least you have bike lanes

[–] matt 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is just bike lanes in general, it feels like they're just painted in randomly to shut people up, except they're just not practically useful.

[–] aeharding 10 points 1 year ago

Engineers love painted bike lanes because they are shoulders/“recovery zones” for cars, but they can sell them as bike infrastructure

insert go ahead, die meme here

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is US bike lanes in a nutshell

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

US bike lanes in a nutshell is really more just a picture of a road shoulder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This one is actually in Vienna, Austria.

[–] fedev 4 points 1 year ago

People park their cars in the bike lanes here 🤬

[–] Annoyed_Crabby 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah in my area, instead of construct a dedicated one, they just paint on an existing lane and that took out half a car lane. It makes sense in theory but in practice there's no point to it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fucking millennials, first there's too few trees, now there's too many, can't make up their minds, can they. /s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Leave the tree, remove the road.

[–] surewhynotlem 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Two nuns are riding their bikes back to the convent:

Nun1 looks around at the scenery and says "Strange, I've never come this way before"

Nun2 replies, "yeah, it's the cobblestones"

[–] Christine 2 points 1 year ago

I spit out my coffee

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most bike lane planners just assume that we can teleport through trees

[–] kwot 8 points 1 year ago

Get a load of this guy who doesn't have a quantum bike pssh

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

If I could teleport, I wouldn't bike ;)

Yeah, bike paths always have least priority. Their main point is to show up in the "Our city has X kilometers of bike path" statistic.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Based fediverse comment section

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Not sure about that. This path was built in 1967. Could be they planted some slim trees and forgot that trees tend to grow.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thunderdome. Two enter, one leaves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Watch it or the tree puns might take root

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That was low hanging fruit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Still better than anything in my area

[–] aeharding 4 points 1 year ago

“Nobody uses the bike lanes”

The bike lanes:

[–] mekkagodzilla 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I refuse to bike on this kind of lane. I just bike on the road, f that.

[–] PutangInaMo 7 points 1 year ago

To shreds you say?

[–] LizardKing15 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have many of these where I live. The worst part is that the police will fine cyclists and scooter riders for riding on the road. So everyone is forced onto the sidewalk where scooters scoot between pensioners, kids, and mothers with strollers. What an idiotic backwards system. Peasants, give way to cars. Fudalistic mentality.

[–] mekkagodzilla 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You live in the US I presume?

Here in Lyon, France, the local government is removing car lanes downtown so we get wider bike lanes. Some are not happy about it, but if you look at the number of people passing through at rush hour, cyclists really outnumber cars, and bike traffic is never jammed.

[–] LizardKing15 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You live in the US I presume?

Asia

[–] mekkagodzilla 1 points 1 year ago

my bad. I guess city and road planning is very car-centric as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

🎵 Simpson. Ho-mer Simpson. He's about to hit a chestnut tree! 🎵

[–] scrof 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I hate when they do this nonsense.

[–] mekkagodzilla 3 points 1 year ago

My city (Lyon, France) is not perfect for bikes by any mean, but this is the kind of lanes they're busy building at the moment, so things are improving and bike traffic is skyrocketing.

voies lyonnaises 1

[–] vitriolix 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I've gotten at the root of the problem

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm stumped.

[–] Impressive_Towel2 2 points 1 year ago

As a Dutch person, that is an appaling excuse for a bike lane.

[–] thriveth 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly, tiles like these are not a problem. The width, though...

[–] Thadrax 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And maybe not cobblestones.

We have a bunch of paths where bikes and pedestrians have their own lanes side by side (both way to narrow, but that's not the point). The pedestrian half is flat tarmac, the bike half is tiles like above. Really annoying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is evil. That happens when the planner of a bike path has never used a bike in their life.

[–] wabafee 1 points 1 year ago

Sports mode bike lane

[–] lupusblackfur 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, seems bout right and normal for a govt-effected job...

[–] thriveth 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the always terrible and shabby government funded bike infrastructure... https://www.wired.com/2014/08/copenhagens-new-bike-skyway-makes-commuting-look-fun/