this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
155 points (94.8% liked)

News

23388 readers
2795 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. moves to de-risk from China with a new investment ban suggest that Western allies may be learning from national security failings in Russia, according to analysts.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LastSprinkles 51 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If we're really learning from mistakes in Ukraine then Taiwan should be recognised as an independent country and admitted into a formal alliance. Not admitting Ukraine into NATO was the mistake we made there and it's being repeated in Taiwan.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey, I 100% support Ukraine and financial aid for them, but I feel like this conflict runs the risk of distorting history. Ukraine has a very corrupt recent past and admitting them before they clean up their own house might well have just been a different kind of mistake. Hopefully we can be formal allies some day.

I don't have an agenda here other than being kind to people who made decisions without the benefit of the hindsight we use to second guess them.

[–] LastSprinkles 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure I agree when it comes to admitting them to the EU. NATO is only a military defence alliance though. If they'd been in NATO this war would never have happened.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m wearing a St. Javelin tshirt as I write this, but NATO can’t have member countries with the levels of endemic corruption that have existed in Ukraine and are still being rooted out. Shit, Resnikov himself was seen to be only one step away from it in the past year.

[–] Gahedros 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It’s a great question. FWIW, I am not sure that Türkiye would be admitted today.

[–] TheDarkKnight 7 points 1 year ago

Yep just straight up spell it with no mucking about. Put Taiwan, Japan, NZ, Australia, SK etc into NATO or its own equivalent and let the stakes be known. If you want WWIII, invade Taiwan. Or move on.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But the US is doing something called "stragetic ambiguity," where they neither ally with Taiwan nor ally with China. China has repeatedly stated that the day Taiwan declares independence is the day they attack. However, if the US ever feels confident enough to actually establish diplomatic relationships with Taiwan, maybe that's not a bad thing either.

[–] LastSprinkles 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah indeed strategic ambiguity has been the approach they've taken so far. If they decided to they could change the approach though. I think it's unlikely China would carry out the threat if a formal alliance was actually announced since in that case they'd be starting a world war. I think it's more likely they'd express outrage, protest and perhaps fly some fighter jets over Taiwan, take some steps short of actual war. My worry is that if the situation remains ambiguous China might conclude that the security guarantees are not real and that US would not respond. Having strong credibility there is essential for maintaining peace I think, especially if the intention is to actually respond.

[–] Stinkywinks 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we should start calling these bluffs. Can't let countries bully the world forever. Stop helping north Korea, add tawain to nato. Give them the finger.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LOL China is a bully? Are you just ignorant of the last 200 years of history. Do you have any idea WHY the KMT managed to maintain a 40-year reign of terror on Taiwan? Why Hong Kong needed to be returned to China? Or why all Europeans were completely immune to Chinese law in living memory? Hint: it was because of a bully, and China was the victim.

[–] Stinkywinks 1 points 1 year ago

Great, but I'm talking about NOW

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LastSprinkles 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah it would require congressional approval. But that's not beyond the realm of possibility as there is bipartisan support for Taiwan in the Congress.

[–] WilliamTheWicked 3 points 1 year ago

Who is downvoting this comment? 7 bots at the time of my comment.

[–] hark 5 points 1 year ago

This article is assuming mistakes were made with Russia instead of things going exactly as planned.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

ITT: liberals literally lobbying for more military spending, more military intervention, and more willingness to use national and transnational nuclear militaries to continue dominating the entirety of the globe.