this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
51 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19086 readers
4799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
51
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by TokenBoomer to c/politics
 

Vote No.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jonna 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This seems like it would make it harder for Ohioans to vote to make abortion and pot legal, against the wishes of the gerrymandered Republican legislature. I would vote no.

[–] CatsGoMOW 3 points 1 year ago

That’s exactly it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Vote No.

1 person = 1 vote

We need to prevent 40% of the population from being able to decide for the majority of Ohioans.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe 8 points 1 year ago

You’d have to be a fucking moron to vote Yes. I mean, like drinking bleach, shooting-self-in-foot stupid.

So I expect “Yes” to have a frighteningly high turnout.

[–] bouldering_barista 7 points 1 year ago

Voted early to get my NO vote in. Trying to get every neighbor, friend, and family member to do the same so this BS doesn't slip through on a special election.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From Ohio, they seem to love cucking themselves so this is probably gonna pass.

Please vote no, I can't think of a single advantage or positive outcome to raising the requirement to 60%.

[–] bouldering_barista 7 points 1 year ago

Not only 60%, but ONE HUNDRED % requirement for county signatures. Literally 1 county could stop an entire vote.

[–] AnyProgressIsGood 3 points 1 year ago

Any American that chooses less control over their government has dog turds for brains

[–] tallwookie 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Issue 1 = 60% vote to pass changes to the State's constitution. what is the % now?

[–] captainlezbian 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Kbobabob 3 points 1 year ago

This is the correct answer.

[–] tallwookie -1 points 1 year ago

ok thanks - didnt see it in the article (and I dont live in Ohio)

[–] Kbobabob 5 points 1 year ago

Issue 1 = 60% vote to pass changes to the State's constitution

Or another way to put it, Issue 1 = 40% vote to stop changes to the State's constitution.

Why should 40% be able to control what goes through?

[–] TokenBoomer 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not from Ohio. I think it’s 50%. Simple majority

[–] AnyProgressIsGood 2 points 1 year ago

It's more than just the percentage look at the county and signature requirements

It'll destroy a check and balance

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I volunteer with a group and wrote postcards to Ohio voters urging a NO vote on Issue 1.

The religious nuts will do anything and everything possible to avoid having votes on abortion rights because they know it's a loser