this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
55 points (98.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5889 readers
582 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] d00phy 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So my wife has an ex-husband who lives in Texas (by choice - loves it there, owns “let’s go Brandon” stuff). They’ve been divorced long enough that their interactions are cordial. She’s a civil servant, and she mentioned to him that all the attacks on federal workers have her worried about her job. His response to this, and many many things, was, “you’ll be fine.”

All this is to say, I think when conservatives don’t understand or don’t want to think about things, they default to “it’ll be fine.” And it will… Until it isn’t. Then they look for who to blame.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then they look for who to blame.

They don't have to look far. There's a line of well-worn scapegoats going out the door and around the block.

[–] d00phy 1 points 1 day ago

I think they have a wheel hidden somewhere of who do we blame today?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Translation: he does not want to hear about it any further.

"When someone tells you who they are, it's best to believe them the first time."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

(NRC) to extend Turkey Point’s operating license to 2053, a reversal of its earlier refusal.

Would make it 86 years old. One of its design criteria is that cooling water must be below 100F. This got exceeded last year, and regulators said NP. New limit is the 104F it hit. Last couple of years, coastal waters around FL have been over 100F.

Reactors this age usually ask for expensive maintenance work to extend operations often just 5 years, Zero mention of this likely means no NRC inspection. These sites were refused an extension in 2019.

[–] Diplomjodler3 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The solution is to fire the regulators, of course.

[–] njm1314 1 points 1 day ago

Then give Elon Musk a giant government contract to take over. And pray I guess after that.

[–] d00phy 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why? They did their jobs: save the state money.

[–] Diplomjodler3 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But how are the oligarchs supposed to get rich like that?

[–] d00phy 1 points 1 day ago

Sorry, in this instance saving the state money saves the oligarchs money. Not having to update or replace the reactors saves money and raises stock prices.

[–] Blaster_M 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Turkey Point survived Hurricane Andrew at full force, but, when it goes underwater due to rising sea level, so will the majority of ~~South~~ Florida.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly, they won’t need it anyway.

It’ll be fine.

… /s