this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
362 points (99.2% liked)

Memes

47280 readers
2115 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Isn't it Blackstone and not blackrock that buys homes (and not that many)?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Q6pu9Ixqqxo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

According to the convincing argument by Gary Stevenson, so long as wealth inequality persists, assets are going to just get more expensive.

https://youtu.be/MSdhijZ7Uz4

It's not collapsing, Jack.

[–] Thteven 35 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I see, so we must collapse Blackrock first.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Just know that black rock has 9% or higher controlling share in almost all companies and they colluded with vanguard and another company I don't remember and all those 3 companies have 9% controlling shares in each others so they all 3 vote same in almost every thing

[–] [email protected] 32 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] xektop 5 points 5 hours ago

They are the most well known private equity firm, but when I learned they are in the 40th place of how many assets they own and manage I was flabbergasted... Worth giving in some more time to understand what happened to the financial world in the past 25-30 years. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/worlds-50-largest-private-equity-firms/ . Personally I can't wrap my head around how much money this ultra rich club has.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, they own the equivalent of 1/3 US yearly GDP?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Not only do BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street own everything, they also own shares in each other. Antitrust is dead; it’s basically one big monopoly. These three firms own corporate America

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

They own most of these shares via their index funds, which do not give them controlling power on the companies

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

Very cool article!

[–] [email protected] 54 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

As a millennial that was somehow able to afford a house this bubble needs to fucking pop.

I'll be locked into this house until I die and all of my friends and family will have to keep moving further away as they get priced out of their apartments each year. Before this I had moved 8 times in 6 years.

[–] MrQuallzin 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Also a millennial. Wife and I got our condo right before everything shot up, got a nice 3.25% APR. Great mortgage honestly. But we've been trying to sell our condo for a YEAR now and I honestly think it's the bubble holding back a sale. The condo is just too expensive for what it is (and the horrific rise of small community HOA fees has gotten way out of hand...). We're priced right compared to others on the market, but selling condos is just stupid hard right now.

Sure I'd love it if we could sell now and get some nice profits from the sale, but I absolutely agree this bubble needs to pop!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

Complains that bubble needs to pop. Is trying to sell a condo but has it priced too high to attract any buyers. Doesn't lower price.

My dude, your desire for more money is the bubble that's holding back the sale.

Your scenario is a microcosm of the whole market.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'm assuming they're looking to buy after this condo sale. If that's the case, they may not have much choice as their next place will be similarly insanely inflated, so they need that money to get the monthly payment to something affordable.

That's the position my partner and I are in. We have equity in our house, but it's mostly because it has "appreciated" to a level that we could never afford, despite making a combined over quarter million dollars a year (due to living in a high cost of living area). Even if we sold our house at full inflated market price and used it all as a down payment, we'd be hard pressed to afford a place with the same price.

It's not that I'm complaining about the equity, it just doesn't get me much when everything else is insanely inflated. We barely squeaked into the place we're in because COVID tanked interest rates and prices in our area.

[–] thejoker954 1 points 1 hour ago

Also its a fucking condo.

[–] chknbwl 2 points 3 minutes ago

I'll never understand people like this. Most of us will never own a home at this rate. Yet there are folks, who already own their home, who are complaining they can't switch their home like it's some trading-card game. They're part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

You know you can lower the asking price to sell it faster...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago

What if they start a huge fire and burnt down a ton of houses if they couldn't hold out anymore?

How Britain almost solved the housing crisis

[–] [email protected] 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No, but they can remain solvent longer than you can survive on the streets.

And that's how they get you.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

they have enough money to remain solvent for generations.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago

and they're using our retirement money to do it

[–] SpruceBringsteen 24 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

What impact would a nationwide guerilla campaign of vandalism against say, Berkshire do?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 17 hours ago

I think we need more than vandalism. But it couldn't hurt. Where's Mario?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Why stop at Berkshire? Vandalize any home that sits vacant. We have more vacant homes than homeless in America. We just need to make vacant homes too big of a risk

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No no no open the house to people that need to crash with a roof over their head. Squatting is the answer. Maybe eve some destructive squatting.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's definitely a more productive solution

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 6 points 12 hours ago

“Productive destructive squatting” sounds like a euphemism for part of my morning routine

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Sounds like a convenient excuse to make everything a rental, or to just tear down all vacant homes.

You can't expect these people to sit by an issue they can toss money at to make better for them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

everything they own is insured and you would be doing them a favor if they could collect on the insurance money instead of holding onto the assets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Insurance will start dropping them fast if it really catches on. A few wouldn’t affect anything. But hundreds?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago

anytime an insurance company withdraws from an arena; they pay out to their biggest policy holders anyways and blackrock has to be the biggest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Probably not. At their level it's probably self insured, so they lose the money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Someone will lose money, but it won't be blackrock

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke 12 points 16 hours ago

Or luigi blackrock

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

I want those 2015 prices