this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
252 points (97.4% liked)

World News

33536 readers
503 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who wants this trade? Does NATO want him gone? Who benefits?

[–] Ghostalmedia -1 points 2 days ago

Trump keeps bitching about elections being postponed because of martial law. Because the Ukrainians don’t want polling places to be targets and Russia to try to interfere in other ways.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You have to be high as hell to think Ukraine would ever be in NATO at this point. All NATO countries would have to agree to start WW3.

[–] Ghostalmedia -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, but that’s the bargaining chip that will be given in exchange for Russia giving back a large part of occupied land.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

There is no way in hell Russia would make such a deal.

[–] TropicalDingdong 64 points 5 days ago (19 children)

This guy has balls the size of western Europe.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Fandangalo 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Actions speak louder than words, and I believe Zelenskyy would. Great example of leadership.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Something like yesterday or so General Secretary of NATO said membership for Ukraine was never proposed. So it's just empty posturing on the side of Zelensky.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (5 children)

"Empty posturing" is a very cynical and cruel way to frame it. What would you have Zelensky do instead? Quietly let Putin and Trump divide his country up?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

It's not enough cynical and cruel for this bastard. Only a pity that the US imperialism again ruined another country and again killed a million people or so. A lot of people were warning this is how it's gonna end and lo and behold, cassandra curse again worked.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A leader ready to sacrifice personal power for national peace—true service to his people.

😺😺😺😺😺

[–] doodledup 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are we going to repost this every day now? I've seen like ten sources here covering this.

[–] Ghostalmedia 3 points 3 days ago

I posted this 2 days ago when it was new. I posted it because someone else posted a paywalled article and this was open to all.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago

The US will dispose of him well before that ever happens. He has outlived his usefulness to US empire.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The whole war was about Ukraine NATO membership.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Remember the Cuban Missile Crisis? Now imagine if Cuba had more than just missiles. Imagine if it were Mexico or Canada joining the Warsaw Pact.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Goal of Putin's rethoric about NATO is his public image. War for him is good external tool to solve internal problems. He is very much capitalist with 10 palaces, 6 yachts and dozens of oligarch friends.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

No disagreements here, Putin is corrupt and guilty of war crimes. I wouldn’t defend Putin not after Chechnya, I am just stating the obvious, no country would like a hostile military alliance at its borders regardless of how criminally corrupt it may be or how good the military alliance may be.

If Ukraine wanted to join NATO it should have kept its nukes. Otherwise it had no option but to remain neutral.

load more comments
view more: next ›