this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
975 points (92.7% liked)

Comic Strips

14139 readers
2743 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Without men who will protect you from men?

Checkmate feminists.

[–] WagyuSneakers 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I thought that's what the bears were for.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

According to Americans: Armed Bears

🧍‍♂️🔫🐻

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I thought they protect the cans of frozen peaches.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Obviously the bears have a right to bear arms but it also protects their right to their own bare bear arms, which are plenty unless the man has a rifle.

In which case yes, that's why the good bears need AR-15s.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind 108 points 3 days ago (20 children)

The thing that NOBODY seems to understand, or maybe not willing to admit is, you CANNOT group people together.

It's the whole reason racism logically makes no sense. At all.

"Oh, all those dirty (insert race here) are good for nothin! They're all assholes!"

And sure, regardless of what race you inserted there, there's going to be some assholes. There's also going to be some amazing people that you're unfairly judging.

And it's not just races. It's anything. Races, genders, religions, countries, social groups, book clubs, whatever.

If you think all people of one group think the same on everything, you're just factually wrong. And if you use that incorrect fact to judge that group, now you're just an asshole.

I've found that people th]?6ink judging people is bad, and wrong. I don't think so. I think some people are just terrible at judging people, and miss the point of judging people. You're supposed to judge them as an individual. Not as (insert group here).

[–] [email protected] 115 points 3 days ago (73 children)

I think we can safely shit on Nazis as a whole, though.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

My critic to what the other guy said, is that you can judge a group of that group is specific enough to judge them on these characteristics.

Are all christians bad? Hell no. Active adult members of the Westboro Baptist Church? Hell yes. They are bad because their website is literally godhatesfags.com.

Now Nazis are fucking Nazis. 11 millions murders should be enough to judge them as a group and those who liked it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (72 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There’s a difference between judging people on a category they don’t choose vs. a set of beliefs they choose to follow.

If I tried to claim all brown-eyed people are evil, I’d be bigoted because eye color does not determine who you are as a person. But if I claimed that all members of the Puppy Kickers Club are evil because they literally believe in kicking puppies and require doing so frequently as a requirement for membership, then my claim is valid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The thing that NOBODY seems to understand [is] you cannot group people together.

🤦🏻‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I know a person who genuinely thinks men shouldn't have any rights because they're so bad. She's like "women are superior, they develop emotional maturity earlier" or "all men are assholes". I think she's a lost hope.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 days ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] dx1 5 points 2 days ago

Trying to figure out if last frame is "epiphany/realization" or a more drawn out equivalent of "suddenly mad NPC"...

[–] chonglibloodsport 53 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Can’t tell his expression at the end. Is he mad or is he ashamed or does he kinda like her?

[–] [email protected] 97 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)
[–] CrayonRosary 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like to imagine he took a minute to glue on eyebrows for the last frame.

[–] angrystego 38 points 3 days ago

The superior template.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] recklessengagement 45 points 3 days ago

My guess is that he's farting

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FauxLiving 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You see this exact issue occur across all kinds of topics.

People pick out the extreme opinions from the most abrasive personalities and hold them up as an exemplar for the group.

The reality is that you're probably just identifying a set of traits (obsessive, hypocritical, lacking self-awareness and easily offended/seeks offense) in a person and then incorrectly ascribing those traits to what you see as that person's group.

This guy ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2QGME8KHzY ) talks about it as a key realization that helped him deprogram himself from the anti-SJW mindset in the '10s.

Now that it's been pointed out to me it does seem to be that, if you look at people complaining about groups online, they're generally complaining about people that share these traits.

[–] dx1 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The worst thing is when somebody takes two things that your "group" did and uses them to accuse you/the group of hypocrisy. When you didn't do any of it. Like, who specifically are you talking about? And why are we talking about them?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (6 children)

This is part of thing with anything. Whos definition of feminism whos definition of communism. Jane Adams feminism. Hell yeah. But then some celebrity in the 80's was arguing against physical fitness tests for firefighters saying well they could use like power axes or something (which you know. did not exist). Which is sorta funny to me because its sorta dissing on womens ability to pass the tests. Its like there are women who can pass the tests. Its not beyond them. Felt antifeminist to me.

EDITED - I think it was Gloria Steinem

[–] renzev 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Protip: when arguing online, a very good strategy for wasting other peoples' time and generally being an insufferable prick is to always pick a slightly unconventional definition of the topic that you're arguing about. It works even better if you shift your definition subtly throughout the course of the argument. That way, each individual statement you make is technically not false, while your overall "argument" is an inconsistent ill-defined undisprovable mess that's impossible to argue against.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›