this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
975 points (92.7% liked)
Comic Strips
14139 readers
2743 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- [email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
- [email protected]: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You see this exact issue occur across all kinds of topics.
People pick out the extreme opinions from the most abrasive personalities and hold them up as an exemplar for the group.
The reality is that you're probably just identifying a set of traits (obsessive, hypocritical, lacking self-awareness and easily offended/seeks offense) in a person and then incorrectly ascribing those traits to what you see as that person's group.
This guy ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2QGME8KHzY ) talks about it as a key realization that helped him deprogram himself from the anti-SJW mindset in the '10s.
Now that it's been pointed out to me it does seem to be that, if you look at people complaining about groups online, they're generally complaining about people that share these traits.
The worst thing is when somebody takes two things that your "group" did and uses them to accuse you/the group of hypocrisy. When you didn't do any of it. Like, who specifically are you talking about? And why are we talking about them?
Yeah, or if you express an opinion, someone will assume a whole list of other opinions that you probably have and attack those instead of what you said.
I'd say it was just ignorance, but it's also a tactic for manipulating conversations that people use intentionally. So you're always playing a game of 'is this person just ignorant, or are they trolling?'
Since social media relationships are ephemeral, since you rarely ever talk to the same person twice... people never have to worry about harming their reputation and being labeled and ignorant or manipulative.
One of the advantage of the old school forum communities is that you quickly learned who was ignorant and who were the trolls. You can't do that on Reddit in 'communities' that contain millions of people (and bots).
No no, nuance be damned. Let's continue condemning entire groups based on their superficial shared membership before we understand them even a little!
/s (jic)
Saw that exact video a few weeks ago and loved it. He does a really great job at explaining the phenomenon.
His other stuff is pretty good too.
He seems to be primarily in the Atheist vs Religion (primarily Christianity) space, but his political and social commentary videos are also very well done.