this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
788 points (98.9% liked)

World News

41099 readers
4517 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

European officials are preparing a multibillion-dollar defense package to bolster regional security and support Ukraine, announced by German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock at the Munich Security Conference.

The package, potentially valued up to 700 billion euros, will fund military training, arms deliveries, and security guarantees amid concerns over Russian aggression and diminishing U.S. contributions to NATO.

The move follows calls for Europe to boost its own defense spending while U.S.-Russian talks, which exclude Ukraine and Europe, on ending the Ukraine conflict continue.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xc2215x 1 points 6 hours ago

A brilliant move from Europe.

[–] Hellsfire29 -1 points 6 hours ago

About time they pull their weight

[–] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Where was this three years ago? Europe wants to make sure every last Ukrainian man is thrown into the meat grinder.

[–] Rooty 2 points 6 hours ago

Better late than never.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Our leaders have been too complacent, for what I think is a simple reason: It's easier to depend on the Americans so your own national budget doesn't take a hit and cause you to lose the next election.

Now that we've seen that the US is an unreliable ally and (rightfully) wants to reduce its' own military aid spending, they're hopefully seeing the bigger picture.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

But why did Europe wait for America to bail before suddenly pulling a trillion dollars out of their pocket?

If Ukraine was supposed to win Europe should have thought about ponying up that cash a bit sooner.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Because they didn't need to. As long as the United States was spending money on their truly vast military and was using that military capacity to defend Ukraine there was no requirement for any other the country do anything.

Now that the US has decided to become a pawn of Russia, it has become important.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They did need to. Ukraine is losing the war bigtime. They needed more weapons at the start before Russia ramped up production.

If Europe sent the weapons at the start they could have broken the stalemate. Filling the American deficit does nothing to help Ukraine win.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago

Because as soon as you propose spending billions of dollars on defending another country, people will generally say "but I don't wanna pay more taxes or lose out on any comforts", which causes you to lose your position of power in case of a democracy. It all comes down to selfishness in the end.

[–] Chee_Koala -3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Why did they wait? Because if all this support started on day 1, a lot of folks would have feared nuclear retaliation and there is no way back from that.

The Russo-Ukrainian conflict is too complex to use your oversimplified perspective, and thus only useful to throw oil on the fire. There are serious nuclear threats, Putin’s unpredictable actions, it also involves many (very different) countries standing up against tyranny. The bureaucracy may be slow in its responses, but efforts are being made to ensure careful moves that prevent escalation. Labeling European leadership as bloodthirsty is misleading in my eyes; they are actively working to protect democracy.

Why would you think European leadership aiming for more dead Ukrainians? Why would they still provide financial and humanitarian support? And increase it now?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 hours ago

So you are saying Europe does not want Ukraine to win because then Russia uses Nukes...

[–] subarctictundra 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is great but IMHO they really need to start building industrial capacity to produce millitary stuff as well. Money's no use when nobody wants to sell you weapons for it...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Zut alors! Vastly outclassed by France, Scheiße!

[–] subarctictundra 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, thanks for the heads up. That's good to know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Some of the most iconic and renowned weapons of the 20th and 21st centuries were made by European countries. HK is a German company for example.

load more comments
view more: next ›