this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
112 points (99.1% liked)

World News

41184 readers
6262 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Europe's leaders are scrambling. Their hastily convened security summit in Paris on Monday is proof of that.

They are still reeling from not being invited by the US to talks with Russia over the future of Ukraine. US President Donald Trump said on Sunday he could be meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin "very soon".

Can Europe, under pressure, put political differences and domestic economic concerns aside, and come up with a united front on security spending and on Ukraine's future, including potentially sending troops there - to force themselves a spot at the negotiating table?

They are going to try.

MBFC
Archive

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EgoNo4 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Can or can't, they'll have to...

[–] Bell 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

All along...if they don't get involved when Ukraine is invaded then they will have to get involved when Poland is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think that a Poland attack is pretty far away. Poland has a pretty big armed service.

Next is more likely to be the Baltics if Putin is feeling brave, or back south to Georgia if Putin is nervous about the Scandinavian/Baltic alliance.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Put has also had his eye on Moldova for quite some time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

But it's on the other side of Ukraine and even if he would take over completely there, I'm pretty sure Ukraine would go into guerilla mode not exactly helping an invasion of Moldova. But it's russia after all, so better not reply on logic alone🙈

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Armenia might also be an option if he wants to be best buds with Azerbaijan again.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure he'd love to get his hands on Armenia, but that's not a big threat to Europe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Neither is Georgia nor Moldova.

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? Moldova is between Ukraine and Romania.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh, I misinterpreted your comment then.

It's still possible to argue that it's "not a big deal", though. Russia has had a constant military presence in the breakaway region of Transnistria for decades, so technically not much would change.

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I didn't say it was not a big deal. I said him taking over Armenia is not a big threat to Europe. A further incursion into Europe via Moldova is a big threat. Especially to Romania. Transnistria is between Moldova and Ukraine. That has been a threat since Russia invaded Ukraine. Invading Moldova and moving that border to Romania would make things an even bigger threat. I'm not sure why I need to explain this in such detail.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In which sense would it be a bigger threat than before?

Unlike Kaliningrad Moldova is landlocked so if Russia manages to take it, the country is not suitable as a staging point for serious military operations, because material can only reach it via air Though given their current international standing I am not sure if reinforcement that way even is a possibility at the moment or in the near future as Romania would likely close their airspace to Russia and Ukraine ... is Ukraine.

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you don't understand what being able to have a military on the border of Romania, where it is not now, is a bigger threat to Europe than the way things are now, I really do not know how to explain it to you. Maybe play a game of Risk sometime? Even if it doesn't explain things to you, it's a fun board game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure it's a bigger threat but by how much? 1%? 2%?

As it currently stands, Transnistria's border is a measly 150 km away from Romania.

If you play your next game of Risk, I recommend you have a look at the size of the countries modelled in the game and compare them to real world values.

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 5 days ago
[–] Botzo 4 points 5 days ago

Oh no, what if it's actually a rom-com: will they, won't they.