this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
38 points (93.2% liked)

politics

20097 readers
4348 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

"As tensions with close allies burst into the open."

Translation: as Trump and Vance create tensions with close allies.

[–] Hobbes_Dent 28 points 1 day ago

He added: “I’ve heard a lot about what you need to defend yourselves from and of course, that’s important. But what has seemed a little bit less clear to me ... is what exactly you’re defending yourselves for?”

The God given right not to be like you.

[–] Placebonickname 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m not saying I want this to happen, but I wonder if having Trump, Vance and Musk around becomes such an issue that a different country decides that they’re a national security threat and decides that they must be “removed”…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

I think it'll be the US military or one of the intelligence agencies who takes on that job.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 5 points 21 hours ago

Would be the surprise of the century if firing all those seasoned FBI and CIA agents actually made intelligence gathering less effective.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Much as I kind of wish the US would be overtaken by a european nation or Canada. Unfortunately it's the problem of how military progress has happened since WW2. AKA the US military is scaled up enough to basically make the USA vs "Every nation of the world suddenly decided to gang up and attack the US at the same time"... is an even match.

Which in and of itself is terrifying to me, that we let that happen. I mean realistically what is more likely to happen in history... 1 crazy leader goes tyranical.... many groups need to get together to stop it. Or... every nation in the world goes insane at the same time, one powerful nation that still holds it's sanity needs to snap them all out of it.

In short IMO a long time ago the world should have done a "OK look, it's not good for one guy to be too much stronger than everyone else. We need to start a pact where, say the US starts trading it's weapons to 10 or more countries... so that theoretically a 5 vs 1... should be a guaranteed victory for the 5.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Bet no one saw that one coming, World War III is everyone versus an insane America.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 1 points 21 hours ago

Not just America I'd wager.

[–] Placebonickname 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry I wasn’t saying that there should be open war. I mean like, I don’t know, what if Trump and Musk both happen to get some sorta serious food poisoning while visiting the G8 Summit or something. Wouldn’t that suck?

:)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

Disregard below/take with a grain of salt

Conspiracy theory: I don't think Ivanka Trump "fell"

It's eerily similar to the Kremlin defenistrations that are happening

I get the feeling the different countries have Trump exactly where they want him

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I wouldn't be surprised that in a year, the US loses half of their allies because of this idiot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

That's his goal. He's still a Russian stooge. Weakening Western alliances benefits Putin's imperialist ambitions.

[–] Treczoks 3 points 19 hours ago

It won't take a year, and it will be more than just half.